Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.currentaffairs.org › news › 2024Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth - Current Affairs

   www.currentaffairs.org › news › 2024

   • Cached

   Apr 8, 2024 · Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth. 2024 Jan/Feb Details. An introduction to limitarianism, and why there should be an upper limit on how much money people can accumulate. Current Affairs. filed 08 April 2024 in Interviews. Ingrid Robeyns is a professor at Utrecht University, where she specializes in political philosophy and ethics.

2. theweek.com › limitarianism-cap-on-extreme-wealthLimitarianism: could we put a cap on extreme wealth?

   theweek.com › limitarianism-cap-on-extreme-wealth

   • Cached

   Apr 5, 2024 · Developed countries with adequate social safety nets, such as her native Netherlands, should impose a limit of €10 million (£8.5 million) on individual personal wealth, according to Robeyns.

3. www.ft.com › content › 30ee490f-c118-4f27-99f2The limits of wealth — calling time on the super-rich

   www.ft.com › content › 30ee490f-c118-4f27-99f2

   Feb 8, 2024 · In her own Dutch context, she takes about €1mn wealth level (twice the price of the average London flat) as the ethical limit we should personally be satisfied with, and €10mn as the political ...

4. www.washingtonpost.com › opinions › 2021/06/12Opinion | Is it time to limit personal wealth? - The ...

   www.washingtonpost.com › opinions › 2021/06/12

   • Cached

   Jun 12, 2021 · Opinion. Is it time to limit personal wealth? Tesla founder Elon Musk in Germany in September 2020. (Odd Andersen/AFP via Getty Images) Warren Buffett has an effective tax rate of 0.1 percent? Yawn.

5. www.thenation.com › wealth-cap-limitarianism-davosThe Case for Capping Wealth at $10 Million | The Nation

   www.thenation.com › wealth-cap-limitarianism-davos

   • Cached

   Jan 17, 2024 · And that limit does not lie at a billion: Instead, we should look more in the range of $10 million as a hard cap on personal wealth. And we should encourage everyone to voluntarily not keep more ...

6. www.latimes.com › opinion › storyOpinion: No more billionaires? We can be more ambitious than ...

   www.latimes.com › opinion › story

   Jan 29, 2024 · There are two limits to wealth that we should consider: one political, the other ethical. They should be set at different levels. The political level should be democratically decided and embedded ...

7. People also ask

   What are the limits to wealth?

   • There are two limits to wealth that we should consider: one political, the other ethical. They should be set at different levels. The political level should be democratically decided and embedded in law and institutions; the ethical level would be a voluntary, personal decision, in which we can take our personal context into account.

   Opinion: No more billionaires? Let's be more ambitious. No one needs

   www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-01-29/billionaires-extreme-wealth-cap-rich-inequality-taxpayers

   See all results for this question

   Should we limit personal wealth?

   • I call this “limitarianism,” in which societies define a cap on how much personal wealth an individual can accumulate. But we should be morally more ambitious than only wanting to get rid of fortunes that are more than $1 billion. If we look carefully at the reasons for limiting personal wealth, we might well agree on a much lower maximum limit.

   Opinion: No more billionaires? Let's be more ambitious. No one needs

   www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-01-29/billionaires-extreme-wealth-cap-rich-inequality-taxpayers

   See all results for this question

   Is there an upper limit on wealth?

   • Ultimately, you come to the conclusion that there has to be an upper limit on the amount of wealth that can be possessed. That’s my argument. There are important values like the survival of the human species on Earth.

   Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth - Current Affairs

   www.currentaffairs.org/news/2024/04/why-we-need-limits-on-extreme-wealth

   See all results for this question

   Should wealth go to the people with the least?

   • If you’re a billionaire, each additional dollar is virtually meaningless, whereas if you are a person who is earning $2 a day, each additional dollar is really important to you. So, as wealth is created, that should make us lean towards favoring it going to the people with the least. Yes.

   Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth - Current Affairs

   www.currentaffairs.org/news/2024/04/why-we-need-limits-on-extreme-wealth

   See all results for this question

   How does extreme wealth affect politics?

   • As I’ve found in my research, extreme wealth allows the super-rich to spend fortunes on lobbying, or to donate huge sums to support political candidates and parties, which gives them a bigger voice in political decisions. Wage hikes for some workers, not others. Why are city leaders picking winners and losers?

   Opinion: No more billionaires? Let's be more ambitious. No one needs

   www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-01-29/billionaires-extreme-wealth-cap-rich-inequality-taxpayers

   See all results for this question

   How does a person's wealth depend on a society?

   • Any individual’s wealth is dependent on the resources, effort, and cooperation of the society that surrounds them.

   Ingrid Robeyn's 'Limitarianism' Makes the Case for Capping Wealth - The

   www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2024/04/ingrid-robeyns-limitarianism-makes-case-capping-wealth/677925/

   See all results for this question

8. www.theatlantic.com › family › archiveIngrid Robeyn's 'Limitarianism' Makes the Case for Capping ...

   www.theatlantic.com › family › archive

   • Cached

   Apr 1, 2024 · Robeyns proposes two upper limits on personal wealth. Most countries with a solid social safety net should bake a 10-million-euro (approximately $10.8 million) cap into their social and fiscal ...