Search results
This aim of this article is to assess the Lisbon Strategy in terms of its failures and successes. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the Lisbon Strategy, the essay identifies two distinct categories of failures. The first category involves output-oriented failures that centre on the Strategy’s performance in light of its goal ...
- Causal Failures of The Lisbon Strategy
- Policy Learning: A Dubious Success?
- Conclusion
- References
Weak governance structures The analysis of the consequential problems presented above suggests that one of the main causes for failure was the weak and ineffective governance structure represented by the OMC. The rationale for selecting the ‘soft’ mode of governance over a centralized supranational method came out of recognition that the potentiall...
In spite of the widely held view that the Lisbon Strategy is a story of failure, a considerable bulk of literature tends to acknowledge some positive aspects of the programme. Perhaps the most prominent one relates to OMC’s capacity of promoting an environment for mutual learning and deliberative problem-solving. In simple terms, the argument goes ...
The aim of this essay was to analyse the Lisbon Strategy in terms of its main failures and successes. In order to paint as full picture as possible, the essay evaluated two distinct categories of failures. First, it demonstrated how the Strategy failed in all key areas to become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world ...
Bulmer, S. (2012) Governing the Lisbon Strategy: Uncertain Governancein Turbulent Economic Times. In: Copeland, P. and Papadimitriou, D. (eds.) The EU’s Lisbon Strategy: Evaluating Success, Understanding Failure. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 29-49. Borrás, S. and Radaelli, C.M. (2010) ‘Recalibrating the Open Method of Coordination: Towards Diverse a...
e. The Lisbon Strategy, also known as the Lisbon Agenda or Lisbon Process, was an action and development plan devised in 2000, for the economy of the European Union between 2000 and 2010. A pivotal role in its formulation was played by the Portuguese economist Maria João Rodrigues. Its aim was to make the EU "the most competitive and dynamic ...
In simple terms, whereas the first category demonstrates how the Lisbon Strategy culminated into a failure, the second one explains why this was the case. Finally, the essay acknowledges that the single positive, yet still dubious, development of the Lisbon Strategy lies in its capacity to encourage policy learning through partial Europeanization of policy problems.
Sep 16, 2008 · The National Reform Programmes were established by Member States in the context of the revised Lisbon strategy on the basis of mutually agreed Integrated Guidelines. This analysis served as a basis to identify key challenges in relation to governance of R&D policies and to provide recommendations for developing knowledge policies that would be more effective in reaching the Lisbon ...
Their Lisbon Strategy recommended a number of efforts on the European Union and national levels, including encouragement of public-private collaboration. Examination at the regional level indicates the need for R&D and innovation policy to help stimulate growth. Current theory turns attention to the effect of system failure in the regions.
People also ask
Why did the Lisbon strategy fail?
Did the Lisbon strategy succeed?
What were the main areas of the Lisbon Strategy?
Why did the European Commission refocus the Lisbon Agenda?
What are Lisbon's New Employment Guidelines?
The Lisbon Strategy, developed at subsequent meetings of the European Council, outlines an economic and social strategy meant to relaunch the EU within the changed context of worldwide competition and the paradigm shift to a knowledge economy and an innovation-based model of growth. The economic pillar was to create the basis for the transition ...
