Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.retaildive.com › news › reebok-was-meant-to-be-aReebok was meant to be a ‘Nike killer.’ How the brand lost ...

   www.retaildive.com › news › reebok-was-meant-to-be-a

   • Cached

   Jul 26, 2021 · By 1997, less than ten years after Nike and Reebok were neck and neck, Nike had grown to $9.2 billion in net sales, while Reebok was stuck at a slower pace, raking in $3.64 billion. It wasn’t an ...

   • Author: Cara Salpini

2. www.jankt.com › reebok-was-meant-to-be-a-nikeReebok was meant to be a 'Nike killer.' How the model ...

   www.jankt.com › reebok-was-meant-to-be-a-nike

   • Cached

   May 1, 2022 · When Joe Foster based Reebok together with his brother Jeff in 1958, it was a small operating shoe firm with reasonably sized ambitions: deal with the athletics market and break into the U.S. By the point Foster retired from Reebok in 1989, the model had scaled to dizzying heights.

3. Images

   • 
   • 
   • 
   • 
   • 

   View all

4. www.retaildive.com › news › the-backroom-when-reebokThe Backroom: When Reebok was on top of the world

   www.retaildive.com › news › the-backroom-when-reebok

   • Cached

   Jul 29, 2021 · Roughly 15 years ago, Adidas acquired rival sneaker maker Reebok in a deal meant to challenge Nike's rise to dominance. ... Reebok was meant to be a 'Nike killer.' How the brand lost its No. 1 spot

   • Author: Ben Unglesbee

5. fashioncoached.com › article › reebok-was-meant-toReebok was meant to be a ‘Nike killer.’ How the brand lost ...

   fashioncoached.com › article › reebok-was-meant-to

   • Cached

   Nov 14, 2024 · Chapter OneWhen Joe Foster founded Reebok with his brother Jeff in 1958, it was a small running shoe company with moderately sized ambitions: tackle the athletics market and break into the U.S.By the time Foster retired from Reebok in 1989, the brand had scaled to dizzying heights. Mick Jagger had w...

6. Videos

   • 

     1:20

     youtube.com

     Are those reebok or nike (subtitles)

     Apr 26, 2014

     18.8M Views

   • 

     9:56

     youtube.com

     How The Reebok Pump Changed The High-Tech Sneaker Game Forever

     Jun 9, 2023

     126.3K Views

   • 

     12:24

     youtube.com

     The Decline of Reebok...What Happened?

     Nov 6, 2019

     1.6M Views

   View all

7. www.industrydive.com › post › how-retail-dive-editorHow Retail Dive Editor Got Inside Look at Reebok's History in ...

   www.industrydive.com › post › how-retail-dive-editor

   • Cached

   As news of Adidas selling Reebok to Authentic Brands Group breaks today, we revisit Retail Dive Senior Editor Cara Salpini's in-depth look at the brand, published last month: Reebok was meant to be a ‘Nike killer.’ How the brand lost its No. 1 spot.

8. money.cnn.com › magazines › fortuneNIKE VS. REEBOK A BATTLE FOR HEARTS, MINDS & FEET AGASSI AND ...

   money.cnn.com › magazines › fortune

   • Cached

   Sep 18, 1995 · Reebok's chief market was women's fitness, and its product line included a range of lower-priced casual shoes. Around 1990, after Nike had regained the revenue lead, Fireman had launched sallies ...

9. People also ask

   Was Reebok meant to be a 'Nike killer'?

   • Reebok was meant to be a ‘Nike killer.’ How the brand lost its No. 1 spot In the ’80s, Reebok was the top sports brand for a time. Now it’s dwarfed by Nike and Adidas. We take a look at the history of the brand, through the lens of the people who were there. Want to listen to this story?

   Reebok was meant to be a ‘Nike killer.’ How the brand lost its No. 1

   www.retaildive.com/news/reebok-was-meant-to-be-a-nike-killer-how-the-brand-lost-its-no-1-spot-adidas-sale-of-reebok/603733/

   See all results for this question

   What happened to Reebok & Nike?

   • It’s not just a story of Reebok’s plateauing growth and eventual decline. It’s also a story of Nike’s incredible rise. By 1997, less than ten years after Nike and Reebok were neck and neck, Nike had grown to $9.2 billion in net sales, while Reebok was stuck at a slower pace, raking in $3.64 billion.

   Reebok was meant to be a ‘Nike killer.’ How the brand lost its No. 1

   www.retaildive.com/news/reebok-was-meant-to-be-a-nike-killer-how-the-brand-lost-its-no-1-spot-adidas-sale-of-reebok/603733/

   See all results for this question

   Is Reebok a good brand?

   • Reebok’s also at a disadvantage when it comes to retroing product, according to Smith, as Adidas and Nike both have a deeper bench of product to pull from. On the other hand, Fireman and Foster see opportunities in Nike growing too big. “Nike’s become ubiquitous. It’s true, it’s in every category. It’s true, it’s the leader.

   Reebok was meant to be a ‘Nike killer.’ How the brand lost its No. 1

   www.retaildive.com/news/reebok-was-meant-to-be-a-nike-killer-how-the-brand-lost-its-no-1-spot-adidas-sale-of-reebok/603733/

   See all results for this question

   How much did Reebok make a year compared to Nike?

   • Reebok had overtaken Nike as the number one athletics brand in the mid-’80s, and in 1989 was still making more than the sportswear giant annually, with $1.82 billion in sales compared to Nike’s $1.71 billion.

   Reebok was meant to be a ‘Nike killer.’ How the brand lost its No. 1

   www.retaildive.com/news/reebok-was-meant-to-be-a-nike-killer-how-the-brand-lost-its-no-1-spot-adidas-sale-of-reebok/603733/

   See all results for this question

   Was Reebok a thorn in Nike's side?

   • Reebok was trying to carve a path to become the third major global sports brand. The company would change out 30% to 40% of its product every quarter in its bid to compete, according to Fireman, and was a thorn in Nike’s side. “We were giving them a heck of a nightmare,” Fireman said. 2004 would also turn out to be the year Reebok’s rise ended.

   Reebok was meant to be a ‘Nike killer.’ How the brand lost its No. 1

   www.retaildive.com/news/reebok-was-meant-to-be-a-nike-killer-how-the-brand-lost-its-no-1-spot-adidas-sale-of-reebok/603733/

   See all results for this question

   How long did it take Reebok to build a $3.6 billion brand?

   • “You think about [the Jordan Brand], a $3.6 billion brand. But they built a $3.6 billion brand by selling out all the time, by never meeting demand. And it took them 35 years to do that.” Reebok’s reliance on a “push” model rather than a “pull” model meant products ultimately ended up on sale, damaging the brand.

   Reebok was meant to be a ‘Nike killer.’ How the brand lost its No. 1

   www.retaildive.com/news/reebok-was-meant-to-be-a-nike-killer-how-the-brand-lost-its-no-1-spot-adidas-sale-of-reebok/603733/

   See all results for this question

10. www.studocu.com › en-us › documentReebok was meant to be a 'Nike killer.' How the brand lost ...

    www.studocu.com › en-us › document

    • Cached

    Reebok was meant to be a 'Nike killer.' How the brand lost its No. 1 spot. July 26, 2021 • By Cara Salpini 45-57 minutes. Chapter One. When Joe Foster founded Reebok with his brother Jeff in 1958, it was a small running shoe company with moderately sized ambitions: tackle the athletics market and break into the U.