Search results
Apr 1, 2021 · Less than two months after The Times story was published, Callen launched a legal effort to seek unspecified damages from Gabriel Tigerman, who Callen claimed intended “to have Mr. Callen ...
- amy.kaufman@latimes.com
- Columnist
Sep 24, 2020 · Not naming those clubs, Callen’s complaint against Tigerman seeks wide-ranging unspecified damages in excess of $25,000. Specifically, the comedian desires “punitive damages according to proof ...
- Dominic Patten
Apr 1, 2021 · LOS ANGELES — Bryan Callen has abandoned his quest to sue the husband of a woman who says the comedian raped her. On Monday, Callen’s attorney filed a request asking the Los Angeles Superior Court to dismiss Callen’s lawsuit against Gabriel Tigerman, whose wife, Katherine Fiore Tigerman, claims that Callen sexually assaulted her in 1999.
Oh, bubba. You get a raise and an extra break. I’m not sure what’s less believable in the complaint: a statement that Callen is a “well-known actor and stand-up comedian” or direct denials of the sexual assault. It's an interesting case.
This document is a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court alleging intentional interference with contractual relations against Gabriel Tigerman and Doe defendants. Bryan Callen, an actor and comedian, alleges that Tigerman has engaged in an ongoing campaign to destroy Callen's livelihood by threatening and harassing Callen's representatives and others who contract with him, based on ...
Sep 25, 2020 · Not naming those clubs, Callen’s complaint against Tigerman seeks wide-ranging unspecified damages in excess of $25,000. Specifically, the comedian desires “punitive damages according to proof ...
People also ask
What damages does Callen Callen seek against Tigerman?
Why is Gabriel Tigerman suing Bryan Callen?
Why did Tigerman cancel Callen's contract?
Why is Bryan Callen suing his accuser's husband?
Did Tom Callen assault his wife 20 years ago?
What is Tigerman's objective?
Sep 23, 2020 · Defendant Gabriel Tigerman’s special motion to strike the complaint of Plaintiff Bryan Callen is granted. Defendant Gabriel Tigerman (“Defendant”) moves to strike the entire complaint of Plaintiff Bryan Callen (“Plaintiff”), which consists of a single cause of action for intentional interference with contractual relations, pursuant to C.C.P. ;425.16.
