Search results
When a higher court reviews a decision made by a judge or judges of a lower court. Appeal allowed: The court has decided in favour of the appellant (party bringing the appeal). Appeal as of right: The automatic right to have a case heard by the Supreme Court in some criminal cases where one judge on the court of appeal has dissented on a point ...
Have a judge alone hear the case in provincial court. Have a judge and jury hear the case in a superior court. Have a judge alone hear the case in superior court. There may be a preliminary hearing before a trial, during which a judge examines the case to decide if there is enough evidence to proceed with the trial. If the judge decides there ...
Jul 17, 2023 · A ruling in your favor by judge or jury in a civil case does not necessarily end the lawsuit. Once a ruling is handed down, the losing party has a right to appeal. The loser must file a written notice of appeal generally within 30 days of the ruling. If this happens, the case goes to an appellate court for review.
Jun 20, 2012 · The Court of Appeal concluded that the appellant met the high threshold necessary to establish a reasonable apprehension of bias. The circumstances created a reasonable apprehension of bias, necessitating a new trial before a different judge. Author's note: The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter.
Court of Appeal Summaries (October 28 - November 1): Zwaan v. LaFramboise, 2024 ONCA 800 (CanLII) CanLII is a non-profit organization managed by the Federation of Law Societies of Canada. CanLII's goal is to make Canadian law accessible for free on the Internet. This website provides access to court judgments, tribunal decisions, statutes and ...
Oct 27, 2019 · A search term led someone to this blog today “how is it legal to get away with lying in court“. There is a whole host of material on the question of what is a “lie”, compared to a false or inaccurate recollection and “litigation wishful thinking”. However this seems an appropriate time to review some of the cases on this issue.
People also ask
How do you decide if a case is dismissed?
What happens if a ruling is handed down in a civil case?
What happens if there is no evidence before a trial?
Is a reference to a trial judge a reasonable apprehension of bias?
What happens if a jury ruled in a criminal case?
How do judges interpret the law?
Oct 21, 2022 · 669.2(3) does not bar a transcript of testimony given at a first trial from being filed as evidence on the merits in a second trial, nor does it require an inquiry by the judge in this regard. Nevertheless, s. 669.2 does not eliminate the judge’s power not to allow a transcript to be filed if he or she finds that the prejudicial effect of filing it would undermine the fairness of the trial.
