Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.canadianjusticereviewboard.ca › articlesApprehension of Bias when judges decide | Canadian Justice ...

   www.canadianjusticereviewboard.ca › articles

   • Cached

   Jun 20, 2012 · The Court found that the reference made by the trial judge in open court concerning the appellant's negative credibility raised a reasonable apprehension of bias, particularly when considered in conjunction with the trial judge's interjection with respect to the allegation of fraud and its apparent impact on his perception of the appellant's case.

2. lukesplace.ca › recent-case-the-function-ofRecent case: The function of appeals and determining judge bias

   lukesplace.ca › recent-case-the-function-of

   • Cached

   Oct 18, 2016 · Van Wieren v Bush, 2015 ONSC 4104. The father appealed to the Superior Court of Justice against an Ontario Court of Justice trial decision about custody and access, claiming that the trial judge, Justice Hardman, was biased against him, failed to consider the best interests of the child and made an order that was contrary to the evidence.

3. www.avvo.com › legal-answers › when-a-judge-rules-inWhen a judge rules in your favor what doesthat mean do I get ...

   www.avvo.com › legal-answers › when-a-judge-rules-in

   • Cached

   Sep 3, 2013 · As required by our Legal Terms, attorneys must disclose if any AI is used in answering your question. Judges make a lot of informal comments off of the record in an effort to move a case a long. I am not saying these comments are not truthful but it does not mean that the Judge will definitely rule your way once the final evidence is admitted ...

4. frenkeltobin.ca › oflm › contempt-and-consequencesContempt and Consequences: When a court order is breached, is ...

   frenkeltobin.ca › oflm › contempt-and-consequences

   • Cached

   A judge may exercise discretion to decline to impose a contempt finding where it would work an injustice. As an alternative to making a contempt finding too readily, a judge should consider other options, such as issuing a declaration that the party breached the order or encouraging professional assistance… 3.

5. www.freeadvice.com › legal › the-judge-or-jury-ruledThe judge or jury ruled in my favor. What happens next?

   www.freeadvice.com › legal › the-judge-or-jury-ruled

   • Cached

   Jul 17, 2023 · Our opinions are our own. A ruling in your favor by judge or jury in a civil case does not necessarily end the lawsuit. Once a ruling is handed down, the losing party has a right to appeal. The loser must file a written notice of appeal generally within 30 days of the ruling. If this happens, the case goes to an appellate court for review.

6. www.canadianjusticereviewboard.ca › articlesThe Problem of Bias in Court Decisions | Canadian Justice ...

   www.canadianjusticereviewboard.ca › articles

   • Cached

   Jun 15, 2012 · The public’s perception of a judge’s impartiality must always be maintained for the administration of justice, even if there is no evidence of a bias or conflict of interest, according to a recent ruling by Ontario’s top court. In its decision in Bailey v. Barbour, 2012 ONCA 325, the three-member Court of Appeal panel found that Justice ...

7. People also ask

   Why is the court not going to rule in my favor?

   • The court is not going to rule in your favor because the evidence of that uncle who is sitting in the Bahamas is not before the court. The court is not going to divine some evidence that may have existed. That is not the role of the court. The court is going to make its decision on the basis of evidence.

   Fundamental Misconceptions About How Judges Make Decisions

   www.formativelaw.ca/2020/10/fundamental-misconceptions-about-how-judges-make-decisions/

   See all results for this question

   Should a judge rule in your favor?

   • On the basis of that character, they want the judge to rule in their favor. The argument, essentially, is that I am a good person, I never lie, I am an honest person, therefore you should rule in my favor. It is very important to understand that character references are 99 percent of the time irrelevant .

   Fundamental Misconceptions About How Judges Make Decisions

   www.formativelaw.ca/2020/10/fundamental-misconceptions-about-how-judges-make-decisions/

   See all results for this question

   Should I rule in my favor if I'm a good person?

   • The argument, essentially, is that I am a good person, I never lie, I am an honest person, therefore you should rule in my favor. It is very important to understand that character references are 99 percent of the time irrelevant . The courts do not take that into consideration unless character is one of the issues in that specific case.

   Fundamental Misconceptions About How Judges Make Decisions

   www.formativelaw.ca/2020/10/fundamental-misconceptions-about-how-judges-make-decisions/

   See all results for this question

   Is a reference to a trial judge a reasonable apprehension of bias?

   • The Court found that the reference made by the trial judge in open court concerning the appellant's negative credibility raised a reasonable apprehension of bias, particularly when considered in conjunction with the trial judge's interjection with respect to the allegation of fraud and its apparent impact on his perception of the appellant's case.

   Apprehension of Bias when judges decide - Canadian Justice Review Bo…

   www.canadianjusticereviewboard.ca/articles-caselaw/articles/apprehension-of-bias-when-judges-decide

   See all results for this question

   What happens if a ruling is handed down in a civil case?

   • Our opinions are our own. A ruling in your favor by judge or jury in a civil case does not necessarily end the lawsuit. Once a ruling is handed down, the losing party has a right to appeal. The loser must file a written notice of appeal generally within 30 days of the ruling. If this happens, the case goes to an appellate court for review.

   The judge or jury ruled in my favor. What happens next?

   www.freeadvice.com/legal/the-judge-or-jury-ruled-in-my-favor-what-happens-next/

   See all results for this question

   What does a judge do if they don't have strong evidence?

   • Regardless of the fact that they may not have strong evidence, regardless of the fact that they may not have presented their case in the best light and with the best evidence, somehow the judge is going to see through all of the facts and figure out what is happening behind the scene. That is not the judge’s role. That is not what judges do.

   Fundamental Misconceptions About How Judges Make Decisions

   www.formativelaw.ca/2020/10/fundamental-misconceptions-about-how-judges-make-decisions/

   See all results for this question

8. www.formativelaw.ca › 2020 › 10Fundamental Misconceptions About How Judges Make Decisions

   www.formativelaw.ca › 2020 › 10

   • Cached

   Oct 30, 2020 · Once the truth emerges, obviously, the judge figures that out and then judge rules on that and in the favor of the party that has more merit,. 2) Now, inquisitorial process is different. In the inquisitorial process there is no adversary or adversaries. In that case it’s essentially one person or one body that is tasked to find the truth.