Search results
Jul 26, 2023 · Obviousness is a crucial aspect of patent law that refers to the level of inventiveness of a patented invention. In simple terms, it means that if your invention is too obvious - if someone with an average level of skill in the relevant field would find it easy to come up with - then it's not deserving of a patent.
- About
Along the way, Ed became licensed by the U.S. Patent and...
- Contact
EDWARD L. WHITE LAW, PC. 829 E. 33rd Street, Edmond, OK...
- Areas of Practice
EDWARD L. WHITE LAW, PC. 829 E. 33rd Street, Edmond, OK...
- About
Obviousness: To be patentable, an invention must be unobvious: section 28.3 of the Patent Act. Relevant date: The claimed subject-matter must not have been obvious on the claim date: section 28.3 of the Patent Act. Four-step approach: The approach for assessing obviousness has four steps (Sanofi):
In making such a rejection, the examiner states that a person skilled in the art would have found it obvious to modify the teachings of the cited prior art references to achieve the claimed invention. There are several ways to overcome this type of obviousness rejection.
Oct 30, 2024 · An invention that would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill at the relevant time is not patentable. See 35 U.S.C. 103 or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a).
Sep 12, 2023 · Learn how to challenge patent validity and understand 'obviousness.' Get insights on key factors and expert evidence in this informative article.
The patent courts agree that an invention must be either obvious or nonobvious to a hypothetical “person having ordinary skill in the art,” but the courts have not agreed upon this person’s credentials.
People also ask
What does it mean if a patented invention is too obvious?
What does it mean if a patent is obvious to a person?
What is obviousness in the context of patents?
How do you know if an invention is patentable?
Can a patent be obvious or nonobvious?
When is a patent claim invalid for obviousness?
Aug 22, 2023 · A patent claim is invalid for obviousness if, based on the information that was available to the public before the applicable disclosure deadline(s), the subject matter of that claim would have been obvious to the PSA.
