Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. 1. Food Labeling: A common example of the distinction without a difference fallacy can be seen in the marketing of food products. For instance, a company might label its orange juice as "100% juice" and "no added sugar." While these two statements may seem to suggest different benefits, they are essentially saying the same thing.

  2. Look up distinction without a difference in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. A distinction without a difference is a type of logical fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things where no discernible difference exists. [1] It is particularly used when a word or phrase has connotations associated with ...

  3. Distinction without a difference is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy ...

  4. The postsymbolist faction sees distinction not only as the essence of logic, but also as the fundament from which logic and perception blossom. Distinction identifies a difference between content and context. Boolean algebra rests upon the two grounds of 0 and 1 (alternatively TRUE and FALSE); in LoF there is only One. Zero, nothing, does not ...

  5. There is also the phrase "a distinction without a difference". This means that that it is possible to distinguish two things, but that the difference between them does not matter in any way that is important (to the author). In addition to the relevant definition ಠ-ಠ provides, "differentiate" has a mathematical meaning. In mathematics ...

  6. I'm assuming you understand the meaning of the implication. In any case it is helpfull to think about simple example when looking at this table. For example: "If it is raining, then close the window". Then it remains to understand the following. P is a sufficient for Q. If P is true then Q will be always true (the first line in the table).

  7. People also ask

  8. A distinction without a difference is a type of logical fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things where no discernible difference exists. [1] It is particularly used when a word or phrase has connotations associated with it that one party to an argument prefers to avoid.

  1. People also search for