Search results
A distinction without a difference is a type of logical fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things where no discernible difference exists. [1] It is particularly used when a word or phrase has connotations associated with it that one party to an argument prefers to avoid.
Definition of Distinction Without A Difference. The logical fallacy of Distinction Without a Difference occurs when someone attempts to label a single situation, fact, or concept with two different terms and argues that they are different, when in reality, there is no meaningful difference. This fallacy involves making a superficial or semantic ...
A distinction without a difference is a type of logical fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things where no discernible difference exists. [1] It is particularly used when a word or phrase has connotations associated with it that one party to an argument prefers to avoid.
May 23, 2024 · Distinction without a difference is a fallacy that often appears in philosophical or political debate. The basic version of the fallacy occurs when a person prefers, or insists on, one term to a synonymous term, even though there is no substantive difference in meaning between the two.
Distinction without a difference is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma.
A distinction without a difference is a type of logical fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things where no discernible difference exists. [1]
There is also the phrase "a distinction without a difference". This means that that it is possible to distinguish two things, but that the difference between them does not matter in any way that is important (to the author).
