Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

      • Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a method that can be used as a means of measuring outcome data from different contexts set out on a 5 point scale of -2 to +2. It enables the data to be placed on a quantitative measurement scale thus tackling the problem of how to adequately identify and measure qualitative goal impact and attainment.
      www.betterevaluation.org/methods-approaches/methods/goal-attainment-scales
  1. People also ask

  2. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) holds promise as an idiographic approach for measuring outcomes of psychosocial interventions in community settings. GAS has been criticized for untested assumptions of scaling level (i.e., interval or ordinal), ...

  3. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a method that can be used as a means of measuring outcome data from different contexts set out on a 5 point scale of -2 to +2.

  4. Mar 26, 2024 · Goal attainment scaling (GAS), an established individualized, patient-centred outcome measure, is used to capture the patient’s voice. Although first introduced ~60 years ago, there are few published guidelines for implementing GAS, and almost none for its use when caregivers GAS is implemented with caregiver input.

  5. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a tool which documents a patients goals, and then scores the extent to which they are attained. The goals are unique to the patient and their situation.

  6. Apr 4, 2019 · Goal attainment scaling (GAS) is an internationally recognized measure that is widely used in educational, counseling, and clinical settings to identify and evaluate relevant goals for an individual.

    • Sneha Shankar, Sheila K. Marshall, Bruno D. Zumbo
    • 2020
  7. In summary, there are two simple ways that social workers can track the progress of their work with individual clients, goal attainment scaling and single system design. Both approaches to practice evaluation use simple, readily accessible technology to track client processes.

  8. Jul 1, 1977 · Goal Attainment Scaling is an evaluation procedure directed at measuring client progress toward therapeutic goals. This critique takes issue with the procedure conceptually and operationally and points out problems of validity and reliability.

  1. People also search for