Search results
- At the dyadic or k-adic level, it refers to the state of peace in relationships between two or more states.
Jun 24, 2020 · Based on this framework, we argue that a peaceful relationship entails deliberation, non-domination, and cooperation between the actors in the dyad; the actors involved recognize and trust each other and believe that the relationship is either one between legitimate fellows or one between friends.
- Johanna Söderström, Malin Åkebo, Anna K Jarstad
- 2021
Based on this framework, we argue that a peaceful relation entails non-domination, deliberation and cooperation between the actors in the dyad, the actors involved recognize and trust each other and believe that the relationship is one between legitimate actors and ultimately an expression of friendship.
understandings of peace conducted in 2019, this chapter explores how these discrepancies between seemingly contradictory narratives of war and peace can be understood. In our analysis, we argue that a relational analysis of peace helps us make sense of this gap. By applying a relational perspective in our analysis of
In this article, we suggest that taking a relational view of peace seriously is a fruitful avenue for expanding current theoretical frameworks surrounding peace as a concept.
Dec 12, 2019 · To capture the complexity of peace in its empirical diversity, our framework approaches peace in three different ways: as a situation or condition in a particular locality; as a web of...
Based on this we propose that an ideal typical definition of relational peace is as follows: A peaceful relation entails behavioral interaction that can be characterized as non-domination,...
People also ask
Is peace relational?
What is a relational peace framework?
What are the components of relational peace?
Are there two types of relational peace?
Is International Peace a relational concept?
Does relational peace entail crime and associated violence?
Oct 21, 2024 · This article shows that defining relational peace in the way that Söderström et al. (2021) do contravenes foundational and longstanding understandings of relationalism that need to be considered to advance the relational study of peace and conflict, and that the relational study of peace and conflict does not require defining relational peace.