Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

      • When, on the oath of a credible person before any judge or magistrate of this state, any person within this state is charged with the commission of any crime in any other state and with having fled from justice, or with having been convicted of a crime in that state and having escaped from confinement, or having broken the terms of the person's bail or parole or violated the conditions of a community control sanction or post-release control sanction, or whenever complaint has been made before...
  1. (1) The escape involved no substantial risk of harm to the person or property of another. (2) The detaining authority knew or should have known there was no legal basis or authority for the detention. (C) Whoever violates this section is guilty of escape.

  2. Sep 30, 2011 · (1) The escape involved no substantial risk of harm to the person or property of another. (2) The detaining authority knew or should have known there was no legal basis or authority for the detention. (C) Whoever violates this section is guilty of escape.

  3. (1) The escape involved no substantial risk of harm to the person or property of another. (2) The detaining authority knew or should have known there was no legal basis or authority for the detention.

  4. Jan 1, 2004 · When, on the oath of a credible person before any judge or magistrate of this state, any person within this state is charged with the commission of any crime in any other state and with having fled from justice, or with having been convicted of a crime in that state and having escaped from confinement, or having broken the terms of the person's ...

  5. Oct 19, 2019 · (A) As the legal custodians of a large number of potentially dangerous inmates, prison officials and employees are confronted with situations in which it may be necessary to use force to control inmates or respond to resistance. This rule identifies the circumstances when force may be used lawfully.

  6. State v. Sawicki (1998), 128 Ohio App. 3d 585 -- Prison escapee pled to F-3 escape and received a one-year sentence. Prison wrote the court pointing out he had been serving time for an F-1 and should have received more time for an F-2 violation of the escape statute.

  7. People also ask

  8. Jan 1, 2024 · (1) The escape involved no substantial risk of harm to the person or property of another. (2) The detaining authority knew or should have known there was no legal basis or authority for the detention.

  1. People also search for