Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Nov 15, 2007 · Abstract and Figures. The study of minority influence has advanced considerably since the late 1960s when Moscovici's pioneering efforts brought the minority's role in the process of persuasion ...

    • How Does The Minority Change The Majority View?
    • Behavioral Style
    • Style of Thinking
    • Flexibility and Compromise
    • Identification
    • Evaluation
    • References

    In this respect, the power of numbers is important – the majority has the power to reward and punish with approval and disapproval. And because of this, there is pressure on minorities to conform. Since majorities are often unconcerned about what minorities think about them, minority influence is rarely based on normative social influence. Instead,...

    This comprises four components: 1. Consistency: The minority must be consistent in their opinion 2. Confidence in the correctness of ideas and views they are presenting 3. Appearing to be unbiased 4. Resisting social pressure and abuse Moscovici (1969) stated that the most important aspect of behavioral style is the consistencywith which people hol...

    If you dismiss the views of other people without giving them much thought, you would have engaged in superficial thought/processing. Research has shown that if a minority can get the majority to think about an issue and think about arguments for and against it, then the minority stands a good chance of influencing the majority (Smith et al., 1996)....

    A number of researchers have questioned whether consistency alone is sufficient for a minority to influence a majority. They argue that the key is how the majority interprets consistency. If the consistent minority is seen as inflexible, rigid, uncompromising, and dogmatic, they will be unlikely to change the views of the majority. However, if they...

    People tend to identify with people they see as similar to themselves. For example, people of the same gender, ethnic group, or age. For example, one study showed that a gay minority arguing for gay rights had less influence on a straight majority than a straight minority arguing for gay rights (Maass et al., 1982). The non-gay majority identified ...

    Most of the research on minority influence is based on experiments conducted in laboratories. This raises the question of ecological validity. Is it possible to generalize the findings of laboratory research to other settings? Edward Sampson (1991) is particularly critical of laboratory research on minority influence. He makes the following points....

    Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In H. Guetzkow (ed.) Groups, leadership and men. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press. Moscovici, S. and Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125-135. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influe...

  2. Jan 1, 1986 · Abstract. Contends that in most studies comparing majority and minority influence, there is an emphasis on influence in the sense of prevailing. Within this context, evidence exists that ...

  3. Contends that in most studies comparing majority and minority influence, there is an emphasis on influence in the sense of prevailing. Within this context, evidence exists that majorities exert more public influence and that minority influence, when it occurs, tends to operate primarily at the latent level. In the present formulation, it is proposed that the differences between majority and ...

    • Charlan Jeanne Nemeth
    • 1986
  4. Jun 26, 2024 · Commitment. Minority Influence occurs when a small group of people or even an individual changes the attitudes/behaviours/beliefs of the majority. Minority influence is likely to lead to internalisation because it is not as easily achieved as majority influence i.e. it is more meaningful. The processes at work in minority influence include:

  5. MINORITY RIGHTS. 1645. Black voting population, a state with significant in-migration from the North to Atlanta,147 and college educated, suburban White voters who disliked the incumbent president Donald Trump for, among other things, his mishandling of the pandemic.148 Consider, first, the racial makeup of Georgia.

  6. People also ask

  7. 5 retrogression test set forth by the Court majority in Georgia v. Ashcroft. Even looking only at retro-gression in minority influence, I find the State of Georgia’s defense of the 2001 plan as non-retro-gressive to be flawed. Nonetheless, I view the out-come of a remand trial as “too close to call.” It