Search results
Prestige score is computed by averaging items: 1, 2 (reversed), 4, 6 (reversed), 8, 13, 14, 15, 17 (reversed). Self-Report Scale. Please indicate the extent to which each statement accurately describes you by writing the appropriate number from the scale below in the space provided. ____ Members of my peer group respect and admire me.
- People
Eric Mercadante Post-Doctoral Student. My research...
- Publications
Toward a Unified Science of Hierarchy: Dominance and...
- Take Pride
In the right doses and the right contexts, it has been...
- Media
Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige...
- Participate
Psychology Student Participants. If you are a UBC student...
- Projects
Nonverbal communication of Dominance and Prestige. his line...
- People
May 1, 2019 · Cronbach's α for both the prestige and the dominance scale was high (prestige: α = 0.89; dominance: α = 0.86), showing a high level of internal consistency in the scales. In support of H2, members of the community from whom participants would like to learn were rated as highly prestigious, but not highly dominant (mean (s.d.) prestige = 5.77 (0.70); dominance = 2.98 (1.19)).
- Charlotte Olivia Brand, Alex Mesoudi
- 2019
The Dominance-Prestige Account of Social Rank Differentiation The Dominance-Prestige Account (Henrich and Gil-White 2001) holds that social hierarchies are multidimensional, arising from two systems of rank allocation. In contrast to prior accounts of hierarchy differentiation (e.g., Anderson and Kilduff
Dominant and Prestigious targets each received greater visual attention than targets low on either dimension. Together, these findings demonstrate that Dominance and Prestige are distinct yet both viable strategies for ascending the social hierarchy, consistent with evolutionary theory.
Work by Cheng and colleagues (2013) suggests that both dominance and prestige serve as viable strategies for attaining influence within newly formed groups. After a group task, undergraduates rated one another on dominance and prestige. Both dominance and pres tige predicted people's influence over group decisions.
121 valued and prioritized in leaders—intelligence, competence, group commitment, and 122 prosociality—consistently predict high status, defined in terms of perceived influence and 123 leadership, as well as more objective influence over group decisions (Báles, Strodtbeck, Mills, &
People also ask
Are dominance and prestige a viable strategy for achieving influence?
Are prestige and dominance ratings related?
Do prestige and dominance predict social influence within groups?
Is there domain-specificity of prestige and dominance hierarchies?
Is prestige more socially malleable than dominance?
What is a dominance scale?
the prestige and dominance scales created by Cheng et al. [7] by asking participants to choose an influential member of their wider community or country and rate their chosen person on these scales. Based on the results of Cheng et al. [1,7] that prestige and dominance are independent means of
