Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. (1) The escape involved no substantial risk of harm to the person or property of another. (2) The detaining authority knew or should have known there was no legal basis or authority for the detention.

  2. (1) The escape involved no substantial risk of harm to the person or property of another. (2) The detaining authority knew or should have known there was no legal basis or authority for the detention.

  3. Barnes (2000), 136 Ohio App. 3d 430 -- A one-year sentence for escape premised on the failure to report to a parole officer during a two-week period does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment because such a sentence for a crime of this gravity does not shock the conscience of the community.

  4. Jan 1, 2024 · (1) The escape involved no substantial risk of harm to the person or property of another. (2) The detaining authority knew or should have known there was no legal basis or authority for the detention.

  5. The offense was an offense of violence, a sex offense, a trafficking offense, or other mandatory prison term. The offender has a prior conviction for a sex offense or felony offense of violence. The sentence is to be served concurrently to a prison-eligible felony offense.

    • 682KB
    • 26
  6. Oct 19, 2019 · There are six general circumstances in which a staff member may use force against an inmate or third person. A staff member may use less-than-deadly force against an inmate in the following circumstances: (a) Self-defense from physical attack or threat of physical harm.

  7. People also ask

  8. Jul 1, 1996 · (A) No person, with purpose to promote or facilitate an escape or resistance to lawful authority, shall convey into a detention facility, or provide anyone confined therein with any instrument or thing which may be used for such purposes.

  1. People also search for