Search results
review. The scope of the narrative review should be defined in the work. Though the standards of systematic reviewing cannot be applied to a work of such breadth, authors should identify evidence through unbiased methods and should document that they have done so, and that they have included all the relevant evidence that they have found. Title ...
A narrative review is a type of literature review that summarizes and synthesizes existing research on a specific topic, resulting in a cohesive narrative of the state of knowledge on the subject. Narrative reviews are often used to provide a broad overview of a topic and to identify areas where additional research is needed.
While a systematic review often focuses on a narrow question in a specific context, with a prespecified method to synthesize findings from similar studies, a narrative review can include a wide variety of studies and provide an overall summary, with interpretation and critique. 1 Examples of narrative review types include state-of-the-art, critical, and integrative reviews, among many others.
- What is a narrative review?
- Characteristics of an effective review
- PLANNING THE REVIEW
- Communicate with the journal editor
- Define purpose, audience, scope
- Plan the literature search
- Use the studies to plan the review structure
- Make an outline
- Example of organized headings
- Writing the introduction
- Writing the main text: synthesize
- Writing the main text: synthesize
- Writing the conclusion
- Writing the abstract
A summary, synthesis, or critique of the literature on a topic Distinct from a systematic review
Is based on a clear purpose Is well organized Brings a fresh perspective Benefits the reader
Talk to the journal editor. Define the purpose, audience, and scope. Plan and carry out a literature search. Use the literature to plan the review structure, then make an outline.
Before you write, communicate with the editor. For solicited reviews, the topic should be defined in the invitation. For unsolicited reviews, ask the editor whether your review would be welcome.
Purpose: discuss recent developments? resolve a debate? answer a question? Audience: experts or non-experts? within or outside your field? Scope: which question(s) will be addressed? to what depth? Examplesofreviews with variouspurposes Examplesofreviews with variousaudiences
Decide what kinds of articles you will look for before you start searching. Study designs or level of evidence Primary outcomes Databases Time period Get help from a librarian at the Research Medical Library.
Take notes on the selected studies. Organize the studies according to: A planned structure Themes A planned structure amended as more themes emerge Tools for organizing studies: A table Labels or annotations in a reference manager
Outline the main points. Use headings and subheadings. Chronologic General to particular Common to rare Most to least important Ensure that subheadings under a heading relate to that heading.
Introduction Disease Classification Genomic Landscape Prognostic Classification Factors Current Therapy Induction Therapy Consolidation Therapy Consolidation with Intensive Chemotherapy Allogeneic Hematopoietic-Cell Transplantation Transplantation Techniques Donor Graft and Cell Source Options Complications of Allotransplantation Relapse after Tran...
Establish the rationale for the review. State the purpose, which should: Flow logically from the rationale. Guide the rest of the review. Keep it short.
“The foundation of researched writing is always the writer’s own ideas, which flow from point to point, supported and guided by research.” –Hodges’ Harbrace Handbook Writing the main text: synthesize Summarize individual studies by restating the main points in your own words. Paraphrase a statement from a study by restating the same information in ...
Use transitions to signal similarities, contrasts, or other relationships between studies. (Examples: however, in contrast, likewise, similarly, furthermore, moreover) Interpret each group of findings as a whole. Identify areas where more research is needed.
End with a conclusion that corresponds to the purpose of the review and is based on the presented material. The conclusion may be followed by a few sentences that emphasize areas where more research is needed.
The abstract of a review is typically unstructured but should contain these elements: Background and rationale Purpose Can also include: Key points made Conclusion
Mar 20, 2024 · Typically narrative literature reviews use peer-reviewed journal articles as their source of scholarship to review, but this might vary based on the individual assignment or review you are conducting. Below are some key elements of a Narrative Lit Review: Places the topic within an existing context
Oct 4, 2023 · When would you use this type of review? Narrative Reviews can be submitted on their own as an article, or can be a part of a more in-depth project, like a book chapter, thesis, or dissertation. Is there an example? Kuwabara AM, Tenforde AS, Finnoff JT, Fredericson M. Iron deficiency in athletes: a narrative review. PM R. 2022;14(5):620-642.
People also ask
What should be included in a narrative review?
What are the elements of a narrative literature review?
What is a narrative literature review?
Why is a narrative review important?
What are the different types of narrative reviews?
What is the scope of a narrative review?
Establish the rationale for the review—that is, the need or gap being addressed. Include any background needed for the rationale to be understood. State the purpose of the review. This should flow logically from the rationale and guide the rest of the review. The following introduction section demonstrates these elements:
