Search results
View of Ohio Complete Announcement. April 12, 2024. In State v. Ahmed, the Court ordered appellee Belmont County Prosecutor’s Office to file a response, if any, by noon Monday, April 15, to the request by appellant Nawaz Ahmed to stay the judgment of the Seventh District Court of Appeals.
- History of the Supreme Court of Ohio » Supreme Court of Ohio
Meet the current justices and previous justices, read about...
- History of the Supreme Court of Ohio » Supreme Court of Ohio
Browse cases. Ohio. Supreme Court. Supreme Court of Ohio cases by year. 2024 (2,293) 2023 (2,544) 2022 (2,378) 2021 (2,689) 2020 (2,761)
Jun 26, 2023 · The case revolves around alleged abuse by Dr. Richard Strauss beginning in the late 1970s. Strauss died in 2005. The university’s lawyers called Strauss’ conduct “reprehensible” but said the...
Jun 26, 2023 · By Corky Siemaszko. The Supreme Court handed Ohio State University a potentially costly defeat on Monday by refusing to reconsider a lower court ruling that said former students should be...
MAPP V. OHIO, decided on 20 June 1961, was a landmark court case originating in Cleveland, in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that under the 4th and 14th Constitutional amendments, illegally seized evidence could not be used in a state criminal trial.
Meet the current justices and previous justices, read about the Supreme Court of Ohio jurisdiction and authority, view a diagram of the Ohio judicial system, or read Ohio's constitution. View All Justices (1803 - present)
People also ask
What happened in Mapp v Ohio?
Why did the Supreme Court decide Mapp v Ohio?
What happened in Smith v Ohio State Univ?
Should former students be allowed to sue Ohio State University?
What happened in Ohio v Corrigan?
Did Ohio split oral-argument time with Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office?
Aug 13, 2020 · The Supreme Court's 1961 decision in Mapp v. Ohio made huge changes for the rights of those accused of a crime by deciding whether evidence gathered without a warrant was admissible in state court. Find out more on FindLaw's Supreme Court Insights.