Search results
1992
- Since 1992, the Ohio Supreme Court has made its opinions freely available at its web site. The Supreme Court’s web site also provides free access to all decisions from the Ohio Court of Appeals from at least 2000.
clevelandlawlibrary.org/Public/Misc/Lunch Finding Ohio Cases.html
This database includes cases filed in the Supreme Court of Ohio on or after January 1, 1985, and practice of law cases filed in the Supreme Court of Ohio on or after January 1, 1989.
LaRose, the Court set a schedule for the filing of the answer, evidence, and briefs. View Third Complete Announcement. In State v. Hundley, the Court ordered appellee State of Ohio to file a response, if any, by Tuesday, Oct. 1, to appellant Lance Hundley's withdrawal of his motion to set execution date.
Since 1992, the Ohio Supreme Court has made its opinions freely available at its web site. The Supreme Court’s web site also provides free access to all decisions from the Ohio Court of Appeals from at least 2000. Although the Eighth District Court of Appeals opinions are only available back to 2000, some COA opinions go back as far as 1991.
- Background of The Case
- Protection from Unreasonable Searches & Seizures
- The Supreme Court's Decision in Mapp v. Ohio
- What Is The Exclusionary Rule?
- Fruit of The Poisonous Tree
- Dissenting Opinions
The case began in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1957 when police demanded entry into 34-year-old Dollree Mapp's home. Although they believed Mapp was hiding a suspected bomber, the police had no search warrant. After calling her lawyer for advice on what to do, Mapp refused to let them in. Thirteen hours later, Cleveland police returned and forced their way ...
The Fourth Amendmentguarantees the right to be free from "unreasonable searches and seizures." Seen as a fundamental right, this Amendment grew directly from what colonists experienced under British rule. Using what were known as "writs of assistance," British officers could enter anyone's home to search for evidence of a crime. By adding the Fourt...
In 1961, Mapp's case reached the Supreme Court, then led by Chief Justice Earl Warren. The majority opinion for the 6-3 decision was written by Justice Tom C. Clark. The six justices in the majority declared that any evidence obtained in a search conducted in violation of the 4th Amendment cannot be admitted in state court. This decision overturned...
In the broadest sense, the "exclusionary rule" prohibits the government from using evidence gathered in violation of the Constitution. Created by the Supreme Court in 1914, the exclusionary rule made Fourth Amendment protections more effectivefor criminal defendants. Intended to deter police misconduct, the rule allows courts to exclude evidence - ...
The exclusionary rule can also extend to chains of evidence, through a doctrine known as "fruit of the poisonous tree."This describes the idea that evidence collected based on other, illegally obtained evidence is also not admissible. For example: Police find significant physical evidence based on information they obtain by interrogating a suspect....
Justice John M. Harlan disagreed with the majority when they opted to dismiss Mapp's First Amendment arguments. Instead, he argued, they should have focused solely on these issues. Because Mapp was convicted under an Ohio statute that criminalized the possession of pornography, he explained, the real problem was whether that law was "consistent wit...
Help articles; Customer support; Contact sales; Cookie Settings; Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information/Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information
Nov 8, 2024 · The case involves a group of relators seeking to place a proposed constitutional amendment titled "Ohio Voters Bill of Rights" before Ohio voters. The relators submitted the text and a summary of their proposed amendment to the Ohio Attorney General, Dave Yost, for certification.
People also ask
When did the Supreme Court of Ohio file a case?
Where can I find free cases in Ohio?
How do I find Ohio Supreme Court opinions?
Where can I find Ohio Supreme Court cases?
Why did the Supreme Court decide Mapp v Ohio?
Where can I find Ohio Court of Appeals opinions?
Jan 12, 2021 · Citation: 2021-Ohio-4060. Docket Number: 2020-0337. Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the court of appeals affirming Defendant's conviction and sentence for one count each of aggravated murder, aggravated burglary, aggravated robbery, and attempted rape, holding….
