Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Jan 8, 2018 · Scientists have spent decades working out the dominance hierarchies among just two or three species. But now, with the help of thousands of citizen scientists, a team of researchers has pieced together a hierarchy that ranks the feeder-fight-club performance of 136 North American bird species.

  2. Mozambique tilapias often travel in groups where a strict dominance hierarchy is maintained. Positions within the hierarchy correlate with territoriality, courtship rate, nest size, aggression, and hormone production. [36] In terms of social structure, Mozambique tilapias engage in a system known as lek-breeding, where males establish ...

  3. Dominance hierarchy. A high-ranking male mandrill advertises his status with bright facial coloration. [1] In the zoological field of ethology, a dominance hierarchy (formerly and colloquially called a pecking order) is a type of social hierarchy that arises when members of animal social groups interact, creating a ranking system.

  4. Jan 12, 2022 · Dominance hierarchies were first described in chickens a century ago by a Norwegian zoologist who coined the term “pecking order.”. Since then researchers such as University of Cincinnati biologist Elizabeth Hobson have examined the intricacies of conflict and competition in species as diverse as primates, whales, birds and insects.

  5. Jan 13, 2022 · A key to understanding how these different species manage dominance is comparative analysis. Strauss and his colleagues created a new database on 135 different species in which dominance data have ...

  6. Jan 13, 2022 · A key to understanding how these different species manage dominance is comparative analysis. Strauss and his colleagues created a new database on 135 different species in which dominance data have ...

  7. People also ask

  8. Jan 10, 2022 · For example, some fishes have size-based dominance hierarchies where subordinates restrain their growth to maintain a minimum size difference between dominants and subordinates. When researchers created groups where the difference between dominant and subordinate size was smaller than the minimum difference observed in natural groups, dominants responded by forcibly evicting subordinates [ 108 ].