Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Mar 28, 2024 · In this review, we identified two key types of individual differences that relate to interpersonal emotion regulation effectiveness: cognitive abilities and personality traits.

    • 28 March 2024
    • 18, Issue4
  2. We investigated how the Big Five traits predict individual differences in five theoretically important emotion regulation goals that are commonly pursued – pro-hedonic, contra-hedonic, performance, pro-social, and impression management.

  3. In this study, both individual differences and situational factors had a bearing on the participants’ choice of emotion regulation strategy, a finding that has important implications for prevention and intervention strategies in the mental health field.

  4. Feb 1, 2020 · We tested whether individual differences (cognitive restructuring skills, need for cognition, mindfulness, and experiential avoidance) moderated the efficacy of ER (i.e., decreased negative emotion from before to after applying the strategy).

    • Thomas I. Vaughan-Johnston, Robyn A. Jackowich, Chloe C. Hudson, Tom Hollenstein, Jill A. Jacobson
    • 2020
  5. Aug 9, 2019 · Goals are widely understood to be central to the initiation, maintenance, and cessation of emotion regulation (ER). Recent studies have shown that there are profound individual differences in the types of ER goals people pursue and the extent to which they pursue them.

    • Lameese Eldesouky, James J. Gross
    • 09 August 2019
    • 12
    • 13, Issue9
  6. Mar 28, 2024 · We define emotion regulation success as achieving one’s emotion regulation goal and differentiate it from related concepts (i.e., maladaptive regulation and dysregulation).

  7. People also ask

  8. Mar 28, 2024 · This paper provides a framework for describing ‘success’ in interpersonal emotion regulation and synthesizes extant theory and research regarding how personality and cognitive ability relate to interpersonal emotion regulation success.