Search results
People also ask
What are the controversies associated with the current peer-review process?
Should you be a peer reviewer?
Why is peer review so difficult?
Do peer reviewers reflect on their own experience?
How many peer reviewers are there in a journal?
What is a good & bad peer review?
Feb 12, 2018 · Consequences of weak peer review include publication of faulty research that misleads clinicians and potentially harms patients (Kearney, 2016). The burgeoning number of scams and retractions creates public mistrust in the integrity of science.
- Sandra P. Thomas
- 2018
4 days ago · Adapting a questionnaire from the examinations of the peer-review process in accounting and finance journals, Bailey et al. conducted a survey to understand how 653 marketing academicians assess the process concerning perceptions of fairness, timeliness, anonymity, improvement of the quality of the research, and prevalence and seriousness of the ethicality of process behaviours. The ...
Nov 21, 2023 · A task force convened by the American College of Cardiology identified the 5 most significant controversies associated with the current peer-review process: the effect of preprints, reviewer blinding, reviewer selection, reviewer incentivization, and publication of peer reviewer comments.
Aug 1, 2019 · This article offers succinct guidance about peer review: not only “what to do” (the Good) but also “what not to do” (the Bad) and “what to never do” (the Ugly). It outlines models of peer review and provides an overview of types of reviewer bias, including conflict of interest.
- Ann T. Gregory, A. Robert Denniss
- 2019
Oct 19, 2023 · The goal of peer review is to provide the editor and author with comments that evaluate the soundness and validity of the research, the methodology, the results, and conclusions (Horbach & Halffman, 2018). Does the manuscript increase nursing knowledge and present new ideas?
Oct 15, 2024 · “When peer review goes well, it is a system that allows authors to improve the way they communicate their results. It is a unique moment of candid exchange between scientists where anonymity...
Nov 12, 2021 · To provide more appropriate and systematic support to peer reviewers, especially those new to the role, this study documents the feedback practices and experiences of two award-winning peer ...
