Search results
4 days ago · Adapting a questionnaire from the examinations of the peer-review process in accounting and finance journals, Bailey et al. conducted a survey to understand how 653 marketing academicians assess the process concerning perceptions of fairness, timeliness, anonymity, improvement of the quality of the research, and prevalence and seriousness of the ethicality of process behaviours. The ...
Nov 12, 2021 · To provide more appropriate and systematic support to peer reviewers, especially those new to the role, this study documents the feedback practices and experiences of two award-winning peer ...
- Sin Wang Chong, Shannon Mason
- 2021
Aug 1, 2019 · This article offers succinct guidance about peer review: not only “what to do” (the Good) but also “what not to do” (the Bad) and “what to never do” (the Ugly). It outlines models of peer review and provides an overview of types of reviewer bias, including conflict of interest.
- Ann T. Gregory, A. Robert Denniss
- 2019
Feb 12, 2018 · Consequences of weak peer review include publication of faulty research that misleads clinicians and potentially harms patients (Kearney, 2016). The burgeoning number of scams and retractions creates public mistrust in the integrity of science.
- Sandra P. Thomas
- 2018
Mar 23, 2018 · The peer review system has remained essentially unchanged since that time. Nonetheless, the intervening 350 years have seen some laudable modifications and enhancements to the system – and some lamentable corruptions.
It is a peer-review that (1) fails to identify major flaws, to communicate criticism to authors to improve their manuscript and to inform fraud to the editor, and (2) does not review all manuscript sections including references and illustrations.
People also ask
Is peer review a flawed process?
What is a good & bad peer review?
Why is peer review important?
Should we conduct peer review for academic journals?
Do peer reviewers reflect on their own experience?
How has peer review changed over time?
Jul 11, 2022 · It is also safe to say that peer review is a critical element of the scholarly publication process and one of the major cornerstones of the academic process. It acts as a filter, ensuring that research is properly verified before being published.
