Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. The 2600 doesn't hold up, it's an early system with very basic games. The novelty to me is in how much they were able to accomplish with such limited hardware. In particular Activision pushed the system way beyond what Atari itself was producing.

  2. Not even close. 2600 Pac-Man isn't nearly as bad of a game in its own right as it is a port of Pac-Man. If the same game had been released with different characters and a different name it wouldn't be anywhere near the top of anyone's list of bad games.

  3. Feb 23, 2022 · People just lost interest in the 2600 eventually, and they wanted something new... and Atari didn't give them anything new (besides the 5200-7800), which is why they fell off so badly. These are just a few unpopular opinions, looking forward to hearing some really interesting ones soon.

  4. Jun 1, 2021 · But most games developed for Atari were not Pac-Man-level quality, and that ultimately led to the platform’s demise. New research from Maryland Smith pinpoints the best strategies for today’s platforms to curate lots of high-quality content and avoid Atari’s fate.

  5. Oct 16, 2020 · The driving force behind the Atari 2600's sales was its collection of now-iconic games. Titles included classics like Asteroids, Frogger, and Space Invaders. RELATED: The 10...

  6. Sep 3, 2020 · We simply had no idea at the time because some of them seemed good because they weren't as bad as others. This has nothing to do with graphics - just poor game design or poor attempts to convert true arcade games to a console which could not replicate the gameplay.

  7. People also ask

  8. Jan 24, 2023 · The Extra – Terrestrial for the Atari 2600. It’s been cited as the worst game ever made so often that a game critic saying “no, it’s not really THAT bad” is practically a rite of passage. Now, it’s my turn. E.T. for the Atari 2600 isn’t really THAT bad. It’s just very boring.

  1. People also search for