Search results
Dec 12, 1996 · Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) Summaries of Judgments and Orders
The dispute in the case arose out of military action taken by the United States against three offshore oil production complexes owned by the Iranian National Oil Company, which were situated in the Persian Gulf.
May 2, 2012 · The notion of ‘armed attack’ is at the heart of the law on the use of force in self-defence. The ICJ first addressed the issue in its judgment in Nicaragua; however, its formulation of the legal parameters of ‘armed attack’ has not been without controversy.
- Judge Abdulqawi A. Yusuf
- 2012
Summary of the Judgment of 27 June 1986 Available in: English French. ... See other cases involving. Nicaragua United States of America.
KEITH HIGHET* PERSPECTIVES. Between a Rock and a Hard Place- The United States, the International Court, and the Nicaragua Case** In June 1986 the International Court handed down one of its most important judgments in forty years. It was certainly the most important for the United States.
Nov 2, 1992 · On 2 November 1992, the Islamic Republic of Iran filed in the Registry of the Court an Application instituting proceedings against the United States of America with respect to the destruction of Iranian oil platforms.
People also ask
Does the ICJ's approach to oil platforms reduce state participation?
Does ICJ have jurisdiction in oil platforms?
Does the International Court have jurisdiction in oil platforms?
Can the world court rule on oil platforms?
Are oil platform attacks justified under Article XX?
Was the Sea Isle City Attack a legitimate response to the ICJ?
This interpretation was criticised for being narrow and overly formalistic by the two dissenting judges (Judges Al-Khasawneh and Elaraby) as well as by Judge Simma in his separate opinion.78 These criticisms, which are valid, relate to two of the distinctions drawn by the Court. 73 Nicaragua Case [1986] ICJ Rep 14, 127. 74 Oil Platforms Case ...
