Search results
Dec 5, 2012 · One of the greatest hackers of all time, Richard Stallman is something of a roving prophet for the free software movement. He invented the first ‘copyleft license’ that made the results of his mammoth feats of computer programming free to use, share and change - without falling foul of copyright.
Copyright reduction. Stallman has regularly given a talk entitled "Copyright vs. Community" where he reviews the state of digital rights management (DRM) and names many of the products and corporations which he boycotts. His approach to DRM is best summed up by the FSF Defective by Design campaign. In the talks, he makes proposals for a ...
Jan 1, 2024 · The license codifies the concept of “ copyleft ,” the “central idea” of which Stallman has described as giving “everyone permission to run the program, copy the program, modify the program, and distribute modified versions, but not permission to add restrictions of their own.
Feb 11, 2010 · Stallman described the worst practices, from video-content-scrambling, the Sony rootkit, music on defective non-standard CDs, the “Amazon Swindle”, right up to Apple’s “iBad”, all designed to move control from the customer to the seller. He went on to refute the industry’s claims of protecting the authors and
Sep 20, 2021 · Why Software Should Be Free. by Richard Stallman. The existence of software inevitably raises the question of how decisions about its use should be made. For example, suppose one individual who has a copy of a program meets another who would like a copy.
Apr 30, 2009 · He claims that a physical object is its own source code and the user is free to alter it and share the object. This is the first mistake: digital objects have recipes, blueprints, and materials that are the source code.
People also ask
What does Stallman mean by copyright?
Who is Richard Stallman?
Why does Stallman reject open-source software?
Why is Stallman important?
It's perjury to claim that you have copyright over something you don't. It's not perjury to claim that something random and irrelevant infringes on the copyright you have. In other words, "I have copyright rights to your video" is perjury.
