Search results
May 31, 2022 · Plaintiffs allege that Thai companies perpetrated these offenses and that companies present in the United States knowingly benefitted from their forced labor. Plaintiffs brought their claims under 18 U.S.C. Section 1595, the civil remedy provision of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (“TVPA”).
Feb 25, 2022 · The seventh Plaintiff, Keo Ratha, worked at an S.S. Frozen seafood processing factory from October 2011 to January 2012. Phatthana and S.S. Frozen are foreign companies. Phatthana is a Thai company that owned two seafood processing factories in Thailand, including the factory in Songkhla province. 3 Phatthana does not have an address, employees ...
Mar 17, 2023 · The plaintiffs in Keo Ratha were a group of Cambodian villagers, who brought the suit against two Thai seafood manufacturing companies, Phatthana Seafood and S.S. Frozen, on allegations that the companies subjected them to trafficking and forced labor in inhumane and unsafe conditions at their factories. The plaintiffs also named two U.S ...
Victims of human trafficking in the multi-billion dollar seafood industry supply chain, which stretches from seafood packing factories in Thailand to supermarkets in the United States, today filed suit in California federal court.
On November 27, 2017, Plaintiffs Keo Ratha (“Ratha”), Sem Kosal (“Kosal”), Sophea Bun (“Bun”), Yem Ban (“Ban”), Nol Nakry (“Nakry”), Phan Sophea (“Sophea”), and Sok Sang (“Sang”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed their Opposition. On December 4, 2017, Phatthana filed a Reply.
Jun 15, 2016 · Keo Ratha et al v. Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd. et al (2:16-cv-04271), California Central District Court, Filed: 06/15/2016 - PacerMonitor Mobile Federal and Bankruptcy Court PACER Dockets PacerMonitor A Fitch Solutions Service Features Plans & Pricing About
Jun 15, 2016 · Keo Ratha et al v. Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd. et al. Follow case documents by RSS. Available Case Documents. The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download: Access additional case information on PACER. Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
