Search results
Mar 17, 2023 · The plaintiffs in Keo Ratha were a group of Cambodian villagers, who brought the suit against two Thai seafood manufacturing companies, Phatthana Seafood and S.S. Frozen, on allegations that the companies subjected them to trafficking and forced labor in inhumane and unsafe conditions at their factories. The plaintiffs also named two U.S ...
May 31, 2022 · Plaintiffs alleged that they were trafficked into Thailand and subjected to forced labor at seafood processing factories. Plaintiffs allege that Thai companies perpetrated these offenses and that companies present in the United States knowingly benefitted from their forced labor.
Jun 17, 2016 · The plaintiffs, Keo Ratha, Sem Kosal, Sophea Bun, Yem Ban, Nol Nakry, Phan Sophea and Sok Sang, filed a complaint for damages and a demand for jury trial in a U.S. federal court in California.
Feb 2, 2018 · Keo Ratha and six other victims – Seam Kosal and his wife Bun Sophea, Yem Ban and his wife, Nol Nakry, Sok Sang, and Phan Sophea – filed a lawsuit on June 15, 2016, against all four seafood manufacturers, accusing them of human trafficking, involuntary servitude, and forced labor.
Jun 15, 2016 · Keo Ratha et al v. Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd. et al (2:16-cv-04271), California Central District Court, Filed: 06/15/2016 - PacerMonitor Mobile Federal and Bankruptcy Court PACER Dockets
- 2:16-cv-04271
- 890 Other Statutes-Other Statutory Actions
- John F Walter
- Alka Sagar
Keo Ratha, et al., Petitioners. v. Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd., et al. Application (22A152) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 29, 2022 to October 28, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
No. 22A152 : Title: Keo Ratha, et al., Applicants v. Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd., et al. Docketed: August 18, 2022: Linked with 22-411: Lower Ct: United States Court ...
