Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. evidence.nejm.org › doi › fullFollow-up to Adolescence after Early Peanut Introduction for ...

   evidence.nejm.org › doi › full

   May 28, 2024 · Participants from a randomized peanut consumption trial were assessed for peanut allergy following an extended period of eating or avoiding peanuts as desired. The primary end point was the...

2. www.jaci-inpractice.org › article › S2213-2198(20A Prospective Validation of the NUT CRACKER Diagnostic ...

   www.jaci-inpractice.org › article › S2213-2198(20

   Oct 7, 2020 · The NUT CRACKER study (Nut Co-Reactivity—Acquiring Knowledge for Elimination Recommendations) evaluated and identified the cross-sensitizations and co-allergies (by an OFC) between 6 nuts (walnut, pecan, hazelnut, cashew, pistachio, and almond) in an Israeli cohort.

   • Author: Michael R. Goldberg, Michael Y. Appel, Rachel Nega, Michael B. Levy, Naama Epstein-Rigbi, Liat Nachs...

   • Publish Year: 2021

3. www.jaci-inpractice.org › article › S2213-2198(20A Prospective Validation of the NUT CRACKER Diagnostic ...

   www.jaci-inpractice.org › article › S2213-2198(20

   In a large-scale prospective trial, this study validates a novel diagnostic algorithm for walnut and pecan allergy. It further demonstrates that basophil reactivity reflects the clinical manifestations of tree nut OFC. How does this study impact current management guidelines?

4. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articlesPeanut Allergen Threshold Study (PATS): validation of ...

   www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articles

   Sep 12, 2013 · This study aims to assess the precision of the predicted ED05 using a single dose (6 mg peanut = 1.5 mg of peanut protein, approximately 1/100th of a peanut kernel) challenge and to validate the modelling that has been used to develop precautionary labelling criteria for VITAL 2.0, as currently VITAL 2.0 uses ED01 (0.2 mg of peanut protein) to ...

   • Author: Giovanni A Zurzolo, Katrina J Allen, Katrina J Allen, Steve L Taylor, Wayne G Shreffler, Joseph L Ba...
   • DOI: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-35

   • Publish Year: 2013
   • Publication: Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013; 9(1): 35.

5. www.jaci-inpractice.org › article › S2213-2198(20Accurate Prediction of Peanut Allergy in One-Third of Adults ...

   www.jaci-inpractice.org › article › S2213-2198(20

   Nov 25, 2020 · In the current study, we showed that Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 are the best predictors of peanut allergy in adults with suspected peanut allergy. Our validated Ara h 2 cutoff level with 100% PPV (cutoff ≥1.75 kU A /L) can be used to accurately predict peanut allergy in one-third of patients.

   • Author: Hannah M. Kansen, Francine C. van Erp, André C. Knulst, Anna M. Ehlers, Sarah A. Lyons, Edward F. Kn...

   • Publish Year: 2021

6. www.jacionline.org › article › S0091-6749(20)31137-4Peanut allergy diagnosis: A 2020 practice parameter update ...

   www.jacionline.org › article › S0091-6749(20)31137-4

   This practice parameter addresses the diagnosis of IgE-mediated peanut allergy, both in children and adults, as pertaining to 3 fundamental questions, and based on the systematic reviews and meta-analyses, makes recommendations for the clinician who is evaluating a patient for peanut allergy.

7. People also ask

   Which test provides the highest diagnostic accuracy for suspected peanut allergy?

   • In the patient presenting for evaluation of suspected peanut allergy, which of the 3 tests—SPT, sIgE to whole peanut, or Ara h 2 would provide the highest diagnostic accuracy as determined by the more optimal positive/negative likelihood ratio? Population: Adults and children presenting for the evaluation of peanut allergy.

   Peanut allergy diagnosis: A 2020 practice parameter update, systematic

   www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(20)31137-4/fulltext

   See all results for this question

   Can diagnostic testing identify patients with a low probability of peanut allergy?

   • Similarly, the collective personal experience of the expert panel was that diagnostic testing in patients with a low probability of peanut allergy (eg, sibling has peanut allergy and patient has never ingested peanut) often identified patients who were sensitized but not truly allergic.

   Peanut allergy diagnosis: A 2020 practice parameter update, systematic

   www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(20)31137-4/fulltext

   See all results for this question

   Can a serology test predict peanut allergy with objective symptoms?

   • When serology tests were used to predict peanut allergy with objective symptoms, the AUC values of sIgE to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 increased slightly to respectively 0.90 (0.85-0.95) and 0.90 (0.84-0.96) ( Figure 1, B ). The concentrations of sIgE to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 were strongly correlated (Spearman's rho correlation coefficient 0.93; P < .01).

   Accurate Prediction of Peanut Allergy in One-Third of Adults Using a

   www.jaci-inpractice.org/article/S2213-2198(20)31245-9/fulltext

   See all results for this question

8. www.sciencedirect.com › science › articleA Prospective Validation of the NUT CRACKER Diagnostic ...

   www.sciencedirect.com › science › article

   Jan 1, 2021 · To validate prospectively the NUT CRACKER (Nut Co-Reactivity—Acquiring Knowledge for Elimination Recommendations) diagnostic algorithm in a new cohort of patients (n = 120) and to study the utility of SPT and BAT in predicting walnut-pecan allergy severity in both groups (n = 183).