Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Specifically, we analyze whether Europeans believe that a consensus or majoritarian political system is best for democracy, and how the type of democracy they endorse might be explained by factors related to institutional learning and the position one holds in the political system.

    • Mónica Ferrín, Enrique Hernández
    • 2021
    • Are consensus democracies better than majoritarian systems?1
    • Are consensus democracies better than majoritarian systems?2
    • Are consensus democracies better than majoritarian systems?3
    • Are consensus democracies better than majoritarian systems?4
    • Are consensus democracies better than majoritarian systems?5
  2. Mar 9, 2022 · More specifically, we hypothesized that the institutional characteristics of consensus democracies (PR electoral systems, oversized coalition governments, multiparty systems, federalism, and bicameralism) would be better suited to deal with polarization than majoritarian institutions.

  3. The study of democracy today has been influenced heavily by Arend Lijphart’s typology of consensus versus majoritarian democracy. Scholars have applied it to more than 100 countries and sought to demonstrate its impact on no less than 70 dependent variables.

    • Matthijs Bogaards
    • 2017
  4. Jul 17, 2018 · Can public deliberation be mainly found in consensus democracies, whereas direct democracy prevails in majoritarian democracies? By analysing OECD countries around the year 2012, we examine these assumptions. The answer is surprisingly clear.

    • Brigitte Geissel, A.M.B. Michels
    • 2018
  5. Oct 23, 2018 · Arend Lijphart's distinction between two dimensions of consensus and majoritarian democracy has been an influential concept. However, several scholars have reported that the distinction does not travel well to other regions or historical periods.

    • Michael Coppedge
    • 2018
  6. In consensus democracies, decisions are legitimate because they are reached through collegial decision-making, bargaining, and compromise. In majoritarian systems, instead, decisions are legitimate because they reflect the will of the majority and those responsible for these decisions can be clearly identi-fied.

  7. People also ask

  8. Majoritarian governments may be able to make decisions faster than consensus government, but fast decisions are not necessarily wise decisions. In fact, the opposite may be more valid, as many political theorists—notably the venerable authors of the Federalist Papers (Hamilton, Jay, and Madison 1788)—have long argued.

  1. People also search for