Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Nov 21, 2023 · Edmonton, AB – Edmonton neurologist Dr. Bradley Jack Stewart was found guilty of unprofessional conduct by a CPSA Hearing Tribunal, for failing to maintain a professional relationship with a patient. Dr. Stewart was accused of violating appropriate boundaries between 2011 and 2013, which included sending a patient improper text messages and emails, and providing personal...

  2. Dec 14, 2021 · Dr. Stewart is responsible for 100 per cent of the costs of the investigation and hearing, totalling $38,538.18. Dr. Stewart must, at his own expense, undergo an assessment by a forensic psychiatrist chosen by CPSA’s Complaints Director, to assess Dr. Stewart’s risk of re-offending and recommend mitigation strategies.

  3. [14] Mr. Boyer confirmed the Complainant submitted a complaint to the CPSA about Dr. Stewart in 2016 regarding his conduct that occurred in 2011 and 2013. Thereafter the College issued a Notice of Hearing dated November 30, 2017 outlining a number of allegations against Dr. Stewart.

  4. Complaints Director of the College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta. Also present was Dr. Bradley Stewart and Mr. Tim Ryan, legal counsel for Dr. Stewart. II. PRELIMINARY MATTERS 3. Neither party objected to the composition of the Hearing Tribunal or its jurisdiction to proceed with the hearing. There were no matters of a preliminary nature.

  5. Jan 20, 2022 · Dr. Bradley Jack Stewart, a neurologist from Edmonton, was sanctioned for unprofessional conduct after failing to abide by an undertaking he signed with CPSA in 2016. Background. In response to a complaint received in 2016, CPSA placed a condition on Dr. Stewart’s practice permit, requiring he have a chaperone present when seeing female patients.

  6. Sep 29, 2021 · The college is not keen to punish doctors but may have no choice in some cases, CPSA council president Dr. Louis Hugo Francescutti said Wednesday. Defiant doctors are having a direct impact on the ...

  7. People also ask

  8. 16. Ms. G initiated a complaint against Dr. Reed under s. 56 of the HPA as a result of the Complaints Director becoming aware that Dr. Reed was subject to criminal proceedings. 17. At the time of the initiation of the complaint, Dr. Reed was a regulated member of the CPSA. He ceased to be a regulated member of CPSA in February of 2023. 18. The ...

  1. People also search for