Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Oct 18, 2016 · The young planet Mars would have had enough water to cover its entire surface in a liquid layer about 140-meters deep. But it is more likely that the liquid would have pooled to form an ocean occupying almost half of Mars’s northern hemisphere, and in some regions reaching depths greater than 1.6 kilometres. ESO/M. Kornmesser.

    • Media Resources

      Fact Sheet. About the NASA Astrobiology Program Fact Sheet –...

    • FAQ

      NASA Astrobiology Program. What is the NASA Astrobiology...

    • Careers

      NASA SCoPE Engages and Empowers at AbSciCon 2024 with Gaming...

    • Missions

      Past, Current, and Future Missions. Any reference in this...

    • Graphic Histories

      Download free coloring pages from the NASA Astrobiology...

    • Life Detection

      Life Detection Contribute Content Go to Life Detection...

    • Overview
    • From drenched to desiccated
    • Clues hidden in Martian jewels
    • Two ways to kill a planet

    Oceans’ worth of ancient water may have been locked up in minerals in Mars's crust, increasing estimates for the total amount of that once flowed on the red planet.

    Today, Mars is a frigid desert. But dried up deltas and riverbanks reveal that water once flowed over the plant’s surface. Where did it all go? Scientists have been trying to answer this question for decades, hoping to understand how Mars became an arid wasteland while its neighbor, Earth, kept hold of its water and became a biological paradise.

    Now, by plugging observations of the red planet into new models, a team of geologists and atmospheric scientists has come up with a new picture of Mars’s past: Much of the planet’s ancient water could have been trapped within minerals in the crust, where it remains to this day.

    Prior research suggested that most of Mars’s water escaped into space as its atmosphere was stripped away by the sun’s radiation. But this new study, published today in the journal Science and virtually presented at this year’s Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, concludes that Mars’s water experienced both an atmospheric exodus and a geologic entrapment.

    Depending on how much water you start with, the new model estimates that anywhere between 30 and 99 percent of it was incorporated into minerals in the planet’s crust, while the remaining fraction escaped into space. It’s a big range, and both processes likely played a role, so “somewhere in there, the reality lies,” says Briony Horgan, a planetary scientist at Purdue University who wasn’t involved with the new study.

    If the new model is accurate, then the story of the planet’s adolescence needs a rewrite. All of the water thought to be trapped in the Martian crust today means that the planet had far more surface water in its youth than previous models had estimated—and that early epoch may have been even more amiable to microbial life than previously thought.

    A multitude of dried up riverbeds, deltas, lake basins, and inland seas make it clear that Mars once had a lot of water on its surface. It may have even had one or several different oceans in its northern hemisphere, although that’s a matter of intense debate. Today, aside from a possible series of briny underground lakes and aquifers, most of Mars’s water is locked up in the polar caps or in ice buried below the surface.

    By looking at the chemistry of Martian meteorites of various ages, and by using NASA’s Curiosity rover to study ancient rocks and measure the current Martian atmosphere, scientists have been able to estimate how much surface water—as ice, liquid water, or water vapor—would have been present at various points throughout Mars’s history. They think that during its earliest epochs, if all that water were in liquid form, it could cover the whole planet in a shallow ocean 150 to 800 feet deep.

    Mars had a more substantial atmosphere in the past, and its pressure allowed liquid water to exist on the surface. But work using NASA’s MAVEN orbiter found that much the planet’s atmosphere was stripped away by the solar wind—charged particles streaming from the sun—perhaps just 500 million years after Mars formed. The reasons why are not clear, although the early loss of the planet’s protective magnetic field probably played a critical role.

    Either way, this atmospheric annihilation vaporized around 90 percent of Mars’s surface water, leaving the water vapor to be broken up by ultraviolet radiation and making Mars a dehydrated wasteland.

    At least, that’s how the story goes. But it has some plot holes.

    The fate of the planet’s ancient water was previously estimated based on the types of hydrogen found in Mars’s present atmosphere. As water vapor in the air is bombarded by ultraviolet radiation from the sun, hydrogen gets stripped away from the oxygen in water molecules. Being a light gas, that free hydrogen easily escapes into space. Some of the water vapor, however, contains a heavier version of hydrogen called deuterium, which is more likely to remain in the atmosphere.

    Scientists know what the natural ratio of hydrogen and deuterium should be on Mars, so the amount of deuterium left behind can be used to determine how much of the lighter version was once present on the planet. Deuterium therefore acts as a ghostly fingerprint that reveals the amount of past water that ultimately escaped into space.

    Hydrogen is still escaping from Mars today, and scientists can measure the rate to work out how much water is being permanently lost. If this rate held steady over the past 4.5 billion years, it would be nowhere near enough to explain the disappearance of so much surface water, says lead author of the new study Eva Linghan Scheller, a doctoral student at Caltech.

    Another clue came courtesy of all the orbiters and rovers examining Mars’s rocks. Over the past two decades, a lot of water-bearing minerals have been discovered, including plenty of clays. At first, only patches were found here and there. But today, “we see evidence for a huge volume of hydrated minerals on the surface,” Horgan says.

    All those extremely old hydrated minerals suggest that, long ago, plenty of water was flowing across the ancient Martian soil—much more than the atmospheric deuterium signal indicated.

    One problem was that previous models didn’t adequately take into account the crust’s ability to lock up water inside minerals, Scheller says. She and her colleagues decided to make a new model to estimate where Mars’s water went over its entire 4.5-billion-year lifetime.

    The model makes some assumptions, such as how much water Mars had to begin with, how much was delivered later by watery asteroids and icy comets, how much was lost to space over time, and how much volcanic activity deposited more water onto the planet’s surface. Depending on the values of those variables, the team found that Mars could once have had enough surface water to make a global ocean 330 to 4,900 feet deep.

    Between 4.1 and 3.7 billion years ago, the amount of surface water decreased significantly as it was soaked up by minerals in the crust and as it escaped into space. None of the hydrated minerals found so far have been younger than three billion years, Scheller says, which implies that Mars has been an arid wasteland for most of its lifetime.

    The new model has its limits, with some key details remaining fuzzy. But it is an important step that “will surely assist many future investigations about the history of water on Mars,” says Geronimo Villanueva, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, who wasn’t involved with the new study.

    For one thing, it helps address a discrepancy between the amount of water estimated by the deuterium measurements and the myriad water features that have been left on the surface. It wasn’t clear how so many rivers and lakes could emerge from so little water, Siebach says, but this new model offers a solution to that mystery by identifying additional water that could have been present on Mars.

    However, the research doesn’t change how much water scientists think is available on Mars today—which isn’t much at all. Astronauts may one day bake hydrated minerals on Mars to unleash their water, Horgan says, but that would be an energy-intensive process.

  2. Aug 12, 2024 · August 12, 2024. Using seismic activity to probe the interior of Mars, geophysicists have found evidence for a large underground reservoir of liquid waterenough to fill oceans on the planet’s surface. The data from NASA’s Insight landerallowed the scientists to estimate that the amount of groundwater could cover the entire planet to a ...

  3. Aug 12, 2024 · CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) — Mars may be drenched beneath its surface, with enough water hiding in the cracks of underground rocks to form a global ocean, new research suggests. The findings released Monday are based on seismic measurements from NASA’s Mars InSight lander , which detected more than 1,300 marsquakes before shutting down two years ago.

  4. Aug 12, 2024 · CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -. Mars may be drenched beneath its surface, with enough water hiding in the cracks of underground rocks to form a global ocean, new research suggests. The information you ...

  5. By Associated Press. Mars may be drenched beneath its surface, with enough water hiding in the cracks of underground rocks to form a global ocean, new research suggests. The findings released ...

  6. People also ask

  7. Mar 5, 2015 · Perhaps about 4.3 billion years ago, Mars would have had enough water to cover its entire surface in a liquid layer about 450 feet (137 meters) deep. More likely, the water would have formed an ocean occupying almost half of Mars’ northern hemisphere, in some regions reaching depths greater than a mile (1.6 kilometers).

  1. People also search for