Search results
- Drawing on a national sample collected by SSI and data from the 2016 ANES, this article finds that the identity-based elements of ideology are capable of driving heightened levels of affective polarization against outgroup ideologues, even at low levels of policy attitude extremity or constraint.
People also ask
Do identity-based elements of ideology drive polarization against outgroup ideologues?
Does ideological identity shape affective polarization in multiparty systems?
Does bipolar affective polarization affect ideological identity?
Does ideological identity affect affective distance between ideological blocs?
What is ideological polarization?
Do ideological beliefs influence affective polarization?
Mar 21, 2018 · Drawing on a national sample collected by SSI and data from the 2016 ANES, this article finds that the identity-based elements of ideology are capable of driving heightened levels of affective polarization against outgroup ideologues, even at low levels of policy attitude extremity or constraint.
- Lilliana Mason
- 2018
Apr 11, 2018 · Drawing on a national sample collected by SSI and data from the 2016 ANES, this article finds that the identity-based elements of ideology are capable of driving heightened levels of...
- Lilliana Mason
Aug 1, 2022 · Likewise, emphasizing a superordinate national identity can reduce out-group animus as well as affective and ideological polarization 281,282,283, consistent with social identity theory...
nominal social identity, a set of issue positions, or an issue-based social identity, is capable of driving heightened levels of political action and social polarization against outgroup partisans, with identity-based elements driving the strongest effects.
Jun 1, 2023 · This paper contributes to the literature that studies affective polarization in multiparty systems by showing that ideological identity shapes affective polarization into two opposing ideological poles and that this effect is not conditioned by issue-based ideology.
May 2, 2022 · Indeed, Mason (2018a, p. 280) concludes that “identity-based elements of ideology are capable of driving heightened levels of affective polarization against out-group ideologues, even at low levels of policy attitude extremity or constraint.”
Drawing on a national sample collected by SSI and data from the 2016 ANES, this article finds that the identitybased elements of ideology are capable of driving heightened levels of affective polarization against outgroup ideologues, even at low levels of policy attitude extremity or constraint.
