Search results
Oct 2, 2018 · Although the DSM criteria do not require distinguishing between clinical and non-clinical populations, it is possible to speculate that specific clinical problems may bias both the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (e.g., irritable bowel syndrome) (69, 70) and the DSM-5 criteria (e.g., fibromyalgia) (71, 72).
- Figure 2
Background: Depression diagnosis requires five or more...
- Table2 2
DM, depressed mood; LI, loss of interest or pleasure; AW,...
- (Table1 1
Hamilton depression rating scale (score), mean (standard...
- PMC Free Article
Association between specific depressive symptoms (entered as...
- Fatigue Correlates With The Decrease in Parasympathetic Sinus Modulation Induced by a Cognitive Challenge
Methods. Twenty-eight healthy female college students...
- Depression and Associated Physical Diseases and Symptoms
Secondly more specific associations appear to exist between...
- Antidepressants and Suicide Risk in Depression
The clinical response to antidepressant treatment is poorer...
- Fibromyalgia and Depression
The Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item Depression Scale...
- Figure 2
In this article, I investigate the longer-term origins in ways that depression was framed by psychiatrists through the impact of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), which from the 1970s became, and to a large extent remains, the dominant tool in assessing the severity of depression.
- Michael Worboys
- 10.1177/1742395312467658
- 2013
- Chronic Illn. 2013 Sep; 9(3): 202-219.
May 5, 2020 · The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) is the most widely used clinician-rated scale for the assessment of depression severity in patients who were already diagnosed with a depressive disorder .
- The Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties of Different Versions
- Jenny Guidi
- Keywords
- Eligibility Criteria
- Disclosure Statement
- Author Contributions
Danilo Carrozzino a Chiara Patierno a Giovanni A. Fava b
Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; b Department of Psychiatry, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
Clinimetrics · Depression · Hamilton Rating Scales · Clinical interview for depression · Symptom questionnaire · Clinical pharmacopsychology · Antidepressant drugs · Psychotherapy · Meta-analysis · Randomized controlled trial · Placebo
We selected and analyzed only those studies, which focused on the clinimetric properties of the HAM-D. To be included in the review, studies had to meet the follow-ing inclusion criteria: English-language article published in a peer-reviewed journal. The study was published as a full-text article. The article was an original study (e.g., research a...
All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
All authors conceived the project. D.C. and C.P. performed the searches and collected the data. All authors analyzed the data. All authors drafted and revised the manuscript.
We present a fully articulated protocol for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), including item scoring rules, rater training procedures, and a data management algorithm to increase accuracy of scores prior to outcome analyses.
- Kelly J. Rohan, Jennifer N. Rough, Maggie Evans, Sheau-Yan Ho, Jonah Meyerhoff, Lorinda M. Roberts, ...
- 2016
Apr 1, 2022 · The correct use of depression rating scales in clinical trials of antidepressants is, as illustrated in Figure 2, to indicate the effect size of the specific items of depression and to accept an effect size of 0.40 or higher as being the clinically significant effect.
People also ask
Do specific clinical problems bias the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale?
What is the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Hamd)?
Should the Hamilton Depression Scale be revised?
What is Hamilton's Scale for assessing depressive illness?
Does the Hamilton Depression Scale discriminate psychiatric patients?
Dec 1, 2004 · RESULTS: The Hamilton depression scale’s internal reliability is adequate, but many scale items are poor contributors to the measurement of depression severity; others have poor interrater and retest reliability. For many items, the format for response options is not optimal.
