Search results
There is growing interest in understanding how emotion regulation affects adaptation. The present study examined expressive suppression (which involves inhibiting the overt expression of emotion) and how it affects one critical domain of adaptation, social functioning.
- Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression strategies ...
In the second section, individual-difference findings are...
- The social consequences of expressive suppression - PubMed
PMID: 12899316. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.48. Abstract. At...
- Reappraisal and suppression emotion-regulation tendencies ...
Both experimental and individual differences approaches to...
- Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression strategies ...
In the second section, individual-difference findings are reviewed showing that using cognitive reappraisal to regulate emotions is associated with healthier patterns of affect, social functioning, and well-being than is using expressive suppression.
Mar 1, 2003 · ... Emotional expression is an emotion-regulation strategy with salutary health effects and it has several social advantages including enhanced relationship satisfaction.
- Self-Regulatory Strength
- Expressive Suppression
- Negative Affect
- Relationship Satisfaction
- Constructive Social Behavior
We preprocessed HR measures for artifacts using the Polar Precision Performance™ Software followed by a visual screening. We then used the HRV Analysis program (Niskanen et al. 2004) to apply a frequency-based technique of power spectral analysis to extract high-frequency components (0.15–0.4 Hz; HF-HRV) that primarily reflect cardiac vagal influen...
Participants rated the extent to which they had tried to (a) not show their emotions and (b) control their emotions by not showing them using a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all true) to 6 (totally true).
Participants rated how they felt directly after the discussion on eight items using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The items came from the German translation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule—Extended (PANAS-X; Grühn et al. 2010; Watson and Clark 1994).
Relationship satisfaction was assessed using two items adapted from the Relationship Assessment Scale (Hendrick 1988; Sander and Böcker 1993). Participants rated the extent to which (a) their partner met their needs and (b) they felt satisfied with the relationship at that moment using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely).
We assessed two aspects of constructive social behavior: establishing equality and conflict resolution. We used observer ratings that represent a normative judgment, which is a valid criterion for socially constructive behavior. Furthermore, observer ratings are less biased by self-presentation and self-deception than self-reports. Reliability was ...
- Fay C. M. Geisler, Michela Schröder-Abé
- 2015
PMID: 12899316. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.48. Abstract. At times, people keep their emotions from showing during social interactions. The authors' analysis suggests that such expressive suppression should disrupt communication and increase stress levels.
Jun 12, 2021 · The current study extends previous work on system justification, emotion regulation, and collective action by suggesting that expressive suppression serves as an emotional brake on the push for social change.
People also ask
Is expressive suppression an emotional brake on the push for social change?
Does expressive suppression affect the social consequences of emotion regulation?
Does expressive suppression affect self-regulatory strength?
Why do people engage in expressive suppression?
Is expressive suppression relevant to collective action?
Do cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression affect emotions?
Both experimental and individual differences approaches to exploring the consequences of emotional regulation consistently find that cognitive reappraisal is more effective than expressive suppression (Gross 2002; Gross & Thompson, 2007; Webb, Miles, & Sheeran, 2012; Gross, 2015).
