Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

      • In a true federation, the smaller states are not sovereign. They cannot legally secede. Canadian federalism has swung between centralizing control and decentralizing it. Both levels of government get their powers from Canada’s Constitution. But it includes features that do not fit with a strict approach to federalism.
      www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/federalism
  1. People also ask

  2. Sep 28, 2021 · Most Canadians continue to be comfortable with the decentralized nature of their federation, with relatively few seeing the need to transfer powers from their provincial or territorial government to Ottawa (figure 2). More significantly, there has been relatively little change since 2019, including in the year after the onset of the pandemic (i ...

    • Andrew Parkin

      Andrew Parkin is the executive director of the Environics...

    • Establishing A Federal Union
    • Unused Unitary Powers
    • Competing Concepts
    • Central Versus Provincial
    • See-Saw Struggle
    • Shift to The Provinces
    • Patriation of The Constitution
    • Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords
    • Conclusion

    The Constitution of the United States (1787) is the first example of a modern federal constitution. A federal union of the British North American colonies was first conceived in the early 19th century. It was pursued more seriously from 1857 onwards. Negotiations among the Province of Canada, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia took place at the Charlott...

    The lieutenant-governor of each province is appointed by the federal government. The lieutenant-governor can stop provincial laws from taking effect until the central government has approved it. The central government can also disallow any provincial law within a year of its passage. (See Disallowance.) Parliament can pass laws related to education...

    Canadian politicians have expressed different versions of Canadian federalism. These differences of opinion have been sharper in Canada than in most federations. They have also been around for a longer period. No consensus has ever been reached about the appropriate relationship between the two levels of government. National and provincial politici...

    The authors of the BNA Act wanted the federal government to be more powerful than the provincial governments. Yet over time, the provinces grew in power. This was partly due to the growing importance of areas of provincial jurisdiction (such as social programs and natural resources). It was also due to a series of court rulings that favoured the pr...

    In practice, Canadian federalism has swung between centralization and decentralization. This has happened due to various political, economic and social factors. Sir John A. Macdonald’s desire for a highly centralized regime reigned for a few years after Confederation. But by the 1880s, the provinces were as powerful as their US counterparts, if not...

    A shift of power in favour of the provinces became clear after 1960. The Quebec government led by Jean Lesage was dynamic and active. It was an effective opponent of centralization. Other factors included the growing importance of provincial natural resources; the decline of the old financial elite based in Montreal (see Laurentian Thesis); economi...

    Around the world, shifts in economic and political power usually lead to formal changes in a country’s constitution. In Canada, the trend toward decentralization had begun by 1960. Not long after, demands for a formal transfer of powers to the provinces became widespread in Quebec. At the time, almost all of the other province had no interest in co...

    These efforts led to an agreement among the 11 first ministers in the Meech Lake Accord of April 1987. It would have recognized Quebec as a “distinct society.” It would have allowed the provinces to help appoint senators and Supreme Court justices. It would have restricted the federal power to spend in areas of provincial jurisdiction; recognized p...

    The patriation of the Constitution and two other rounds of negotiations did not bring Canada any closer to resolving the question of how federalism should evolve. A second Quebec Referendum on sovereigntyin 1995 revealed widespread dissatisfaction with federalism. Those who support more provincial autonomy stress the diversity of all the provinces’...

  3. Aug 11, 2017 · While this research reveals that Canada has not experienced massive decentralization since its birth (in fact, decentralization has been slight), it shows that the Canadian federation has avoided overall centralization and, arguably, kept a reasonably good federal balance.

    • André Lecours
    • 2019
  4. Jul 4, 2019 · Federal systems (see Federalism) differ greatly in the constitutional structures and powers of the two levels of government. Those in which the central government has preponderant weight, whether in legislative jurisdiction, financial capacity or administrative activity are described as centralized.

  5. Dec 13, 2003 · In terms of the federal and provincial governments, Canada is one of the world’s most decentralized federations. But in terms of the role of local and municipal governments, it is one of the most centralized. We have strong provinces, and weak local government.

    • 311KB
    • 29
  6. Feb 7, 2006 · Decentralization, in federal countries, occurs when there is a substantial sharing of power, authority, financial resources and political support among federal, provincial and local GOVERNMENTS. The less concentrated these resources are in the central government, the more decentralized the system.

  7. Jan 1, 2019 · The federation’s overall trajectory has been slight decentralization. Decentralization has occurred in nine policy fields (see figures A1 , A2 , and A3 ) while centralization

  1. People also search for