Search results
WASHINGTON — Beyond the complex Left versus Right debates, and the endless diatribes on the merit of this or that public policy advocated or opposed by either side, it is of crucial importance to stress that the Left has the enormous advantage of appearing to own the moral high ground.
The moral high ground, in ethical or political parlance, refers to the status of being respected for remaining moral, and adhering to and upholding a universally recognized standard of justice or goodness.
Jul 24, 2024 · The most hotly contested moral foundations have to do with the first three foundations as both Left and Right appeal strongly to those values but see them through radically different moral lenses. During the COVID pandemic, for example, a common conservative argument was that lockdowns were unconstitutional expansions of governmental authority.
Jan 1, 2024 · Yet, closely connected to these reputational advantages, deontological targets come across as taking the moral high ground—perceiving themselves as morally superior based on a more absolutist, rule-focused view on morality.
Finally, “the moral high ground” is subjective. The left and right do not even agree with what is “morally right” in the first place. Liberals and conservatives have completely different values.
The OP appears to think taking the moral high ground means refusing to protect/defend/stand up for yourself, or otherwise makes you vulnerable to exploitation. I’m asking them to elaborate, and provide a specific scenario where this is the case.
People also ask
Does the left own the moral high ground?
What is moral high ground?
Does taking the moral high ground lead to a moral reproach?
Is education defending a moral high ground from popular culture?
Do unpopular moral positions fuel self-righteousness?
Are morally justifiable options more self-righteous in congruent dilemmas?
Dec 7, 2017 · Liberals place moral emphasis on caring: for the poor, the disadvantaged, and the marginalized; on fairness in the sense of redressing both historic wrongs and current inequalities of outcome; and on generosity extending beyond the bounds of nations or cultures.
