Search results
Sep 24, 2023 · The Commodore 64 and Atari computers were more than just machines; they represented a pivotal moment in computer history when personal computing became accessible to the masses. Their impact on technology cannot be overstated, as they laid the foundation for future advancements that continue to shape our modern world.
- Atari 800 vs Commodore 64: Who Came First?
- Atari 800 vs Commodore 64: Graphics
- Commodore 64 vs Atari 800: Sound
- Speed
- Sales Figures
- Cost
- Available Software
- The Disk Drive
- Commodore 64 vs Atari 800 Today
- Conclusion
Atari was way ahead of Commodore. They were also way ahead of everybody else. While everyone else was trying to figure out how to get a monochrome display on a CRT and considered sound a luxury, Jay Miner and the rest of his team were trying to design the very best machine they could with late 1970s technology at a price point of around $1,000. Wha...
Both machines were capable of color bitmap graphics with movable spritesin hardware, which made programming two-dimensional arcade style games much easier. The reason Commodore and Atari games tend to be a different genre than Apple II games is because of this capability. When you went to write that type of game on an Apple II, you had to handle sp...
When the Commodore 64 came out, its engineers said its sound was 10 times better than anything else on the market, and twice as good as it needed to be. Yet it was about 1/3 the chip that Commodore engineer Bob Yannes wanted to build. The sound chip that ended up in the Apple IIGS, about 4 years later, was closer to what he wanted to build in 1982....
On paper, the Atari was about 76% faster than the Commodore 64, which seems like a huge difference. That’s like the difference between an i3 and an i7 CPU. In practice, it didn’t exactly work out that way. The Atari usually was faster, but not 75 or 76% faster, like the specifications suggest. But today, when you are pushing the limits of both mach...
The Commodore 64 won this battle in the marketplace. The Atari 800 family was not a flop, but the Commodore 64 went on to become the best-selling home computer of all time. Atari sold around 4-5 million units, while Commodore sold closer to 12 million. Commodore’s marketing, while it usually left much to be desired, was effective at attacking Atari...
The Commodore 64 had the cost advantage. When Commodore announced the machine, Atari initially did not know how Commodore delivered a computer with 64k of memory, color graphics, and sound at the $599 price point. Of course, Atari figured out how to get into the same price range, but since Commodore had the capability to make its own custom chips, ...
The Commodore 64 ended up with a software library of around 9,000 titles. Only the Apple II family had more at the time. And just like today, having the larger software library provides a huge advantage. Atari’s library was closer to 1,000 titles and in early 1984 it did have the largest library of any home computer, but Apple and Commodore ended u...
The popularity of disk drives caught both companies by surprise, but it was Commodore who really popularized the idea, by releasing a disk drive at the $300 price point. Atari’s disk drive was more expensive, partly because it was faster. Eventually the two reached price parity, but once word was out the cheapest way to get 64K and a disk drive was...
Both the Commodore and Atari 8-bit lines have thriving communities around them today, with new software being developed for them and new hardware products to make it possible to get them online, provide solid state storage, and otherwise make them more convenient to use while preserving that 1980s feel. Which of the two you like better probably dep...
The Commodore 64 outsold Atari by a factor of about three to one. It had the right blend of capability, affordability, and available software. It wasn’t a perfect machine, but it was the right machine for its time. The Atari 800 is the most underrated and underappreciated machine of its era. Graphically, it was the better of the two machines. Commo...
The answer is largely in the of the beholder, as both systems offered similar features in terms of computing power, memory, graphics, and price points. While on paper, the systems were virtually the same; however, the Commodore system dominated in sales throughout the 80s. Category. Atari. Commodore.
Jun 30, 2018 · The new project was dubbed the VIC-40 but renamed the C64 in time for CES. The Commodore 64’s 40-column screen was much easier to read than the VIC-20’s. The VIC-II chip supported 320×200 monochrome and 160×200 multi-colour video modes, 16 colours and could manage 8 24×21 (or 12×21 colour) pixel sprites, – independent graphics objects ...
Dec 10, 2007 · The term personal computer was a common term in the early 80’s and was used as early as 1972 to characterize Xerox PARC's Alto. During this era of microcomputer innovation, the market was dominated by the IBM Personal Computer (IBM PC), the Commodore 64, the Atari 8-bit family, the Apple II, Tandy Corporation's TRS-80s, and various CP/M machines.
Apr 20, 2022 · April 20, 2022. This year marks the anniversary of the most popular selling home computer ever, the Commodore 64, which made its debut in 1982. Note that I am saying “home computer” and not ...
People also ask
How did Commodore 64 and Atari impact technology?
Why did Commodore & Atari become so popular?
Are Commodore 64 & Atari Games still being developed?
Which computer was more popular Commodore 64 or Atari 64?
When did the Commodore 64 come out?
Which system was better Atari or Commodore?
Mar 21, 2018 · Atari showed the world that technology was cool before the personal computer revolution took off and were reaching an ever-growing audience with a product that is still cool today: video games. We believe Atari introduced mass audiences to the digital age, ahead of Apple, Commodore, Microsoft, and even the Homebrew Computer Club.
