Search results
- Justify your recommendation with concrete evidence and specific examples. Be specific so the authors know what they need to do to improve. Be thorough. This might be the only time you read the manuscript. Be professional and respectful. The authors will be reading these comments too. Remember to say what you liked about the manuscript!
plos.org/resource/how-to-write-a-peer-review/
People also ask
What makes a good peer reviewer?
What should a peer review look like?
How do you write a good peer review?
Why is peer review important?
What should be included in a peer review?
Should you proofread a peer review?
Feb 7, 2020 · What does a good peer review look like? 1. Start with a (very) brief summary of the paper. This is a useful exercise for both reviewers and authors. If you struggle to summarise what the paper is about, that suggests the authors need to improve the clarity of their writing.
You’ll provide constructive criticism to your peers and receive the same in return, allowing everyone to learn and grow. Finding the right words to provide meaningful feedback can be challenging. This article provides positive and negative phrases to help you conduct more effective peer reviews.
- Review Outline
- Giving Feedback
- Before and After: Sample Reviewer Comments
- Suggested Language For Tricky Situations
- Time to Submit The Review!
Use an outline for your reviewer report so it’s easy for the editors and author to follow. This will also help you keep your comments organized. Think about structuring your review like an inverted pyramid. Put the most important information at the top, followed by details and examples in the center, and any additional points at the very bottom. He...
Giving feedback is hard. Giving effective feedback can be even more challenging. Remember that your ultimate goal is to discuss what the authors would need to do in order to qualify for publication. The point is not to nitpick every piece of the manuscript. Your focus should be on providing constructive and critical feedback that the authors can us...
Keeping in mind the guidelines above, how do you put your thoughts into words? Here are some sample “before” and “after” reviewer comments ✗ Before “The authors appear to have no idea what they are talking about. I don’t think they have read any of the literature on this topic.” ✓ After “The study fails to address how the findings relate to previou...
You might find yourself in a situation where you’re not sure how to explain the problem or provide feedback in a constructive and respectful way. Here is some suggested language for common issues you might experience. What you think: The manuscript is fatally flawed. What you could say:“The study does not appear to be sound” or “the authors have mi...
Be sure you turn in your report on time. Need an extension? Tell the journal so that they know what to expect. If you need a lot of extra time, the journal might need to contact other reviewers or notify the author about the delay.
Jun 4, 2024 · Peer review is a critically important service for maintaining quality in the scientific literature. Peer review of a scientific manuscript and the associated reviewer's report should assess specific details related to the accuracy, validity, novelty, and interpretation of a study's results.
The dominant method currently utilized for peer review is the so-called single-blind review, in which the identity and affiliations of the authors are known to the reviewers, whereas the identity of reviewers remains unknown to the authors.
Sep 27, 2023 · Here, we’ve put together a quick guide on what to include and exclude from your peer review comments. What are the key features of a constructive review?
Oct 10, 2022 · Peer review can function as both a gatekeeper to protect the published record of science and a mechanism to improve research at the level of individual manuscripts. Here, we have described our strategy, summarized in Table 2, for performing a thorough peer review, with a focus on organization, objectivity, and constructiveness. By using a ...
