Search results
- The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work.
authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/what-is-peer-review/the-peer-review-process.html
People also ask
What is the peer review process?
How effective is the peer-review process?
Why do authors value the peer review process?
Why is peer review important?
How good is the scirev peer review process?
How long does a peer review process take?
The peer review process is essential for evaluating the quality of scholarly works, suggesting corrections, and learning from other authors’ mistakes. The principles of peer review are largely based on professionalism, eloquence, and collegiate attitude.
You can, however, save time by only producing one review for both the authors and the editor, as these versions can be the same, with some very minor adjustments. How do you approach a peer review? Everyone may have their own way of approaching a review, and if it works for them then the advice would be to stick with this.
- Neel Halder, Peter Tyrer, Patricia Casey
- 2021
- First Response Time
- Total Review Duration
- Immediate (Desk) Rejection Time
- Referee Reports
- Revision Time
- Rating of Peer Review Experience
For authors, the duration of the first review round, or first response time, is probably the factor they are mostly interested in, as this takes up a substantial part of the total manuscript evaluation time and to a large extent determines how much time is lost if the outcome is negative. First response time includes the time taken by the journal f...
Total review duration refers to the time a manuscript is under responsibility of the journal. Besides by the duration of the first review round, total review duration is also determined by the number and duration of subsequent review rounds. Total review duration does not include the time taken by authors to revise and resubmit their manuscript. Gi...
Immediate rejection time is the time an editor takes to inform authors that he or she is not interested in the manuscript (and will therefore not send it to reviewers). Our figures clearly show that immediate rejection time is a major source of unnecessary time loss in the peer review process (Table 3). On average, an immediate rejection in Medicin...
The average number of referee reports is about 2.2 in all scientific fields (see Table 4). This correspondence is remarkable, given the substantial differences between fields in other respects. There is slight variation in the experienced quality of the referee reports between the fields [as indicated on a scale running from 0 (very bad) to 5 (exce...
The time from the first submission date to the final decision date is not only influenced by the time the manuscript is at the editorial office or being reviewed, but also by the time authors take to revise their manuscript. It is therefore important to look also at the duration of the revision time. Table 5shows that authors who received a revise-...
The SciRev questionnaire gives authors the opportunity to provide an overall rating of the review experience on a scale from 0 (very bad) to 5 (excellent); see Table 6for details. Authors of accepted manuscripts give the peer review process a much higher rating (4) than authors of rejected manuscripts (2.2). Moreover, the rating of the peer review ...
- Janine Huisman, Jeroen Smits
- 2017
Nov 12, 2021 · The peer-review process is the longstanding method by which research quality is assured.
- Sin Wang Chong, Shannon Mason
- 2021
Peer review is well suited for quality improvement (QI) given the crucial role in ensuring the integrity and credibility of scientific research. Currently, little is known about the peer reviewer tasks for specific journals.
One of the primary goals of the peer review process is to identify flaws in the work and, by so doing, help editors choose which manuscripts to publish. It is surprising that one of the persistent problems in peer review is assessing the quality of the reviews.
May 29, 2019 · The peer-review process for scientific professional journals serves two distinct purposes. First, constructive comments from impartial academic, scientific, and clinical experts ensure that manuscripts are revised and edited to achieve the highest possible quality prior to publication.
