Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. Oct 26, 2014 · Advocate but don’t argue. There is a fine line between being a persuasive advocate and being argumentative. Advocate by pointing out any contradictions the judge’s ruling may have with legal precedent and the practical impact the court’s ruling may have on your case and other similar cases.

  3. Being well-prepared will allow you to respond effectively to the challenging judicial phenomena discussed below. Judicial questioning (sometimes called interruptions) The complaint is sometimes made (privately, in the gowning room) that the presiding judge did not even “let” counsel make his or her submissions.

  4. May 18, 2016 · Early research about the judge, using resources such as The Robing Room website or discussions with local colleagues, is the best insurance against ending up in front of a hostile judge who is guaranteed not to like you or your case. But what do you do if your research did not preemptively reveal a bias or disqualification is not available?

    • Know The Judge. A lawyer with a firm knowledge of the laws and the rules of court is always full of confidence. But as important as knowing the law and rules is, it is also necessary for lawyers to know the procedure specific to each judge in court.
    • Don’t Argue! Advocate! Years of training in the law school in the art of argument make lawyers want to argue on any subject and with everyone. Lawyers should know the difference between advocacy and argument.
    • Get Your Points On Record. Most courts are courts of record. The judges and the courts record all proceedings for future reference. The beauty of the judicial system is the existence of the hierarchy of courts.
    • Don’t Lose Your Cool. No matter what happens, remember to always be in control of your emotions. Most difficult judges already have their minds made up.
  5. Sep 25, 2024 · Judicial misconduct is a serious breach of judicial ethics, including actions like bribery, bias, or abuse of power. Proving misconduct requires evidence and legal assistance. The definition of judicial misconduct is a serious deviation from the accepted practices of a judge in the judicial profession. Misconduct is defined as conduct which is ...

  6. Nov 3, 2015 · When you put those two aspects of the judgment together, you have I think the key elements of a wrongful judicial decision: disrespect for the law and an absence of empathy. A judge who merely disrespects the law acts very badly. And a judge who lacks empathy does so as well.

  7. If you are unhappy with a decision of a judge or a justice of the peace in court, you can pursue an appeal on your own or by consulting with a lawyer or paralegal.

  1. People also search for