Search results
$30,054 per year
- Armstrong, the commander of the mission, was paid the highest salary: $30,054 per year, according to a 1969 NASA news release. That's worth $209,758 today.
moneywise.com/life/entertainment/what-it-cost-to-land-on-the-moonHere's How Much the Historic 1969 Moon Landing Cost - MoneyWise
Sep 12, 2019 · According to the Orlando Sentinel, NASA wasn't exactly cagey about what it was paying him, either. "As a civil servant," the agency said in a news release just before the moon landing, "Armstrong, a GS-16 Step 7, earns $30,054 per annum."
- Dangerous Job
According to CNN, linemen make just under $60,000 a year in...
- Astronauts
He did sort of do some stuff on the Moon, though. Sort of....
- Dangerous Job
- Overview
- Figuring out the true cost of Apollo mission
- A different calculation today
In 1961, when President John F. Kennedy committed the nation to sending an astronaut to the moon "before this decade is out," the federal budget enjoyed a surplus and economists were calling for government spending to stimulate the economy.
Even so, the final price tag still boggles the mind. Between 1960 and 1973, NASA spent $28 billion developing the rockets, spacecraft and ground systems needed for what became the Apollo program. According to a recent analysis by the Planetary Society, that translates into an estimated $288.1 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars.
That's roughly equivalent to spending NASA's current annual budget on a single project and sustaining that effort for more than a decade.
Now, 50 years after the first Apollo moon landing, NASA is aggressively pursuing a Trump administration directive to return astronauts to the lunar surface in 2024. After five decades of technological progress, NASA will not be starting from scratch, and the total cost will be much lower than the price tag for Apollo.But it will not be cheap, and billions in additional funding will be required.
The space agency has not revealed any detailed cost estimates, and it's not yet known whether Congress will go along. But a new Gallup poll shows most Americans continue to support space exploration.
"Solid majorities of Americans feel that NASA's budget is justifiable and that it should be maintained or increased," the polling organization wrote on its website. "The 1969 moon landing's upcoming anniversary may have elevated the historic achievement in Americans' minds as of late, as their recall of the first man on the moon is stronger than it was 20 years ago.
Casey Dreier, author of the analysis and senior space policy adviser for the Planetary Society, said the analysis was conducted because the historical record is incomplete, difficult to unravel and, in some cases, simply incorrect.
Given the Trump administration's directive to send astronauts back to the moon by the end of 2024 in the newly named Artemis program, budget estimates for the Apollo program and the money actually spent provide valuable insights into hurdles the new moon program will face on Capitol Hill.
"How much was spent on Apollo, and when, is relevant as NASA has once again been directed to return humans to the moon," he writes on the Planetary Society website. "To properly evaluate the seriousness of this directive, it makes sense to compare its spending proposals to the one data point we have for a successful human lunar mission.
"How much money did it take to do it the first time? How was it spent? And, perhaps most importantly, when did the money show up?"
In reconstructing the cost of Apollo, Dreier evaluated official NASA budget submissions to Congress between 1961 and 1974, actual spending as reported by the space agency and countless supporting documents.
To adjust the results for inflation, he used NASA's New Start Index, designed specifically for aerospace projects, which is believed to provide more accurate insights compared to the Consumer Price Index, which focuses on household and consumer goods.
Today's political and economic realities are vastly different than the ones Kennedy faced.
"The one thing that people forget about Apollo is that the federal budget was in surplus and economists were calling for government spending to stimulate the economy in 1961," Logsdon said. "So the kind of trillion dollars a month deficit spending we're doing wasn't there at all. And I think that ... may be the overriding constraint on doing anything like Apollo."
NASA's 2020 budget request, including $1.6 billion in supplemental funding to kick-start the Artemis moon program, comes to $22.6 billion. Of that total, $6.4 billion is directed to exploration, a 27% increase over 2019 levels.
Since 2005, NASA has spent by some estimates approximately $16 billion developing the re-purposed Orion crew capsule that will carry astronauts to and from the moon in the Artemis program and nearly $20 billion, according to at least one estimate, developing the huge Space Launch System (SLS) rocket needed to launch the lunar landing missions.
Both programs underwent extensive modifications, driving up costs, as program goals changed between the Bush, Obama and Trump administrations.
As it now stands, an initial unpiloted SLS test flight is planned for late next year or, more likely, 2021 with the first piloted flight of an Orion capsule expected in the 2022-23 timeframe. The first Artemis moon landing, using the third SLS booster and a yet-to-be designed lander, is planned for 2024.
- CBS News Space Consultant
- 3 min
At the time of the Apollo 11 flight in 1969, Neil Armstrong was paid a salary of $27,401 and was the highest paid of the flying astronauts, according to the Boston Herald. That translates to $190,684 in 2019 dollars.
Aug 22, 2019 · Armstrong, the commander of the mission, was paid the highest salary: $30,054 per year, according to a 1969 NASA news release. That's worth $209,758 today. Aldrin earned $18,622.56, which may not sound like much — but it works out to $129,973 in today's inflated dollars.
- Esther Trattner
Jul 19, 2019 · It took 400,000 people to put two men -- Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin -- on the Moon 50 years ago on July 20, 1969. It also took billions of dollars to fund the project, according to The Planetary...
- Ann Schmidt
Neil Armstrong, the first man to set foot on the Moon, 20 July 1969. Salary: Regular astronaut's salary of dollars 20,000 a year. No bonuses were paid on the Moon-landing mission, but the...
Jul 12, 2019 · Was the $25bn spent putting men on the Moon money well spent? Not according to American tax payers in 1967.
