Search results
Use the word calamity to describe an event that causes great harm and misery, or a general state of distress or misery: the calamity of war.
- The Great Starvation
The Great Starvation - Calamity - Definition, Meaning &...
- The Great Hunger
The Great Hunger - Calamity - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms...
- The Irish Famine
The Irish Famine - Calamity - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms...
- Kiss of Death
something that is ruinous. “if this were known it would be...
- Vis Major
Vis Major - Calamity - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms |...
- Meltdown
severe overheating of the core of a nuclear reactor...
- Unavoidable Casualty
Unavoidable Casualty - Calamity - Definition, Meaning &...
- Inevitable Accident
Inevitable Accident - Calamity - Definition, Meaning &...
- The Great Starvation
a great misfortune or disaster, as a flood or serious injury. grievous affliction; adversity; misery: the calamity of war. Latin calamitāt- (stem of calamitās), perh. akin to incolumitās safety. Middle French. late Middle English calamite 1375–1425. reverse, blow, catastrophe, cataclysm; mischance, mishap. See disaster.
The meaning of CALAMITY is a disastrous event marked by great loss and lasting distress and suffering. How to use calamity in a sentence.
Oct 10, 2022 · Use the word calamity to describe an event that causes great harm and misery, or a general state of distress or misery: the calamity of war. Near synonyms are catastrophe and disaster. The noun calamity is from Middle English calamytey, from Latin calamitas, a word which might be related to Latin clades "destruction." Calamity Jane was the ...
- Overview
- Evolution of theories of war
war, in the popular sense, a conflict between political groups involving hostilities of considerable duration and magnitude. In the usage of social science, certain qualifications are added. Sociologists usually apply the term to such conflicts only if they are initiated and conducted in accordance with socially recognized forms. They treat war as an institution recognized in custom or in law. Military writers usually confine the term to hostilities in which the contending groups are sufficiently equal in power to render the outcome uncertain for a time. Armed conflicts of powerful states with isolated and powerless peoples are usually called pacifications, military expeditions, or explorations; with small states, they are called interventions or reprisals; and with internal groups, rebellions or insurrections. Such incidents, if the resistance is sufficiently strong or protracted, may achieve a magnitude that entitles them to the name “war.”
In all ages war has been an important topic of analysis. In the latter part of the 20th century, in the aftermath of two World Wars and in the shadow of nuclear, biological, and chemical holocaust, more was written on the subject than ever before. Endeavours to understand the nature of war, to formulate some theory of its causes, conduct, and prevention, are of great importance, for theory shapes human expectations and determines human behaviour. The various schools of theorists are generally aware of the profound influence they can exercise upon life, and their writings usually include a strong normative element, for, when accepted by politicians, their ideas can assume the characteristics of self-fulfilling prophecies.
Reflecting changes in the international system, theories of war have passed through several phases in the course of the past three centuries. After the ending of the wars of religion, about the middle of the 17th century, wars were fought for the interests of individual sovereigns and were limited both in their objectives and in their scope. The art of maneuver became decisive, and analysis of war was couched accordingly in terms of strategies. The situation changed fundamentally with the outbreak of the French Revolution, which increased the size of forces from small professional to large conscript armies and broadened the objectives of war to the ideals of the revolution, ideals that appealed to the masses who were subject to conscription. In the relative order of post-Napoleonic Europe, the mainstream of theory returned to the idea of war as a rational, limited instrument of national policy. This approach was best articulated by the Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz in his famous classic On War (1832–37).
Britannica Quiz
History of Warfare
World War I, which was “total” in character because it resulted in the mobilization of entire populations and economies for a prolonged period of time, did not fit into the Clausewitzian pattern of limited conflict, and it led to a renewal of other theories. These no longer regarded war as a rational instrument of state policy. The theorists held that war, in its modern, total form, if still conceived as a national state instrument, should be undertaken only if the most vital interests of the state, touching upon its very survival, are concerned. Otherwise, warfare serves broad ideologies and not the more narrowly defined interests of a sovereign or a nation. Like the religious wars of the 17th century, war becomes part of “grand designs,” such as the rising of the proletariat in communist eschatology or the Nazi doctrine of a master race.
Some theoreticians have gone even further, denying war any rational character whatsoever. To them war is a calamity and a social disaster, whether it is afflicted by one nation upon another or conceived of as afflicting humanity as a whole. The idea is not new—in the aftermath of the Napoleonic Wars it was articulated, for example, by Tolstoy in the concluding chapter of War and Peace (1865–69). In the second half of the 20th century it gained new currency in peace research, a contemporary form of theorizing that combines analysis of the origins of warfare with a strong normative element aiming at its prevention. Peace research concentrates on two areas: the analysis of the international system and the empirical study of the phenomenon of war.
Students save 67%! Learn more about our special academic rate today.
- Joseph Frankel
Sep 11, 2015 · Here is how Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms (1984) distinguishes the three words from one another: disaster, calamity, catastrophe, cataclysm are comparable when they denote an event or situation that is regarded as a terrible misfortune. A disaster is an unforeseen mischance or misadventure (as a shipwreck, a serious railroad accident ...
People also ask
Is War a calamity or a social disaster?
What does calamity mean?
What is the difference between a disaster and a calamity?
How do you use calamity in a sentence?
What does Calamity Jane mean?
Did Kathleen Hunt predict a calamity?
Nov 20, 2019 · A disaster is an event that causes great harm, unhappiness etc. Calamity and catastrophe are similar, but even more emphatic. All of these words can describe serious harm or be used humorously for exaggeration: Aid workers are struggling to help in the disaster area. A series of calamities led to him losing his home. Catastrophe!
