Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.reddit.com › r › C_ProgrammingMSVC vs MinGW vs Clang for Windows in 2020? - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › r › C_Programming

   • Cached

   The only advantage is that you get a statically-linked CRT — versus linking against an old msvcrt.dll per Mingw-w64 — though historically Microsoft's UCRT has been kind of buggy, and those bugs then get baked into your binaries.

2. stackoverflow.com › questions › 67848972Differences between msvcrt, ucrt and vcruntime libraries

   stackoverflow.com › questions › 67848972

   Jun 5, 2021 · Works out of the box on every Microsoft Windows versions. UCRT (Universal C Runtime) is a newer version which is also used by Microsoft Visual Studio by default. It should work and behave as if the code was compiled with MSVC. Better compatibility with MSVC, both at build time and at run time.

3. www.reddit.com › r › cppMinGW vs Visual C++ on performance? : r/cpp - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › r › cpp

   • Cached

   MinGW because it's the closest to GCC and gives me a good indication of whether or not my code will compile cross-platform without having to wait for the build system. My code has to run on OSX, Linux and Windows. Visual C++ because it often has higher performance with math calculations than MinGW. It's often comparable to GCC on Linux though.

4. www.dice.com › career-advice › speed-test-2Speed Test 2: Comparing C++ Compilers on Windows

   www.dice.com › career-advice › speed-test-2

   • Cached

   Nov 26, 2013 · 64-bit MingW The MingW compiler's appeal is that it links with the Microsoft runtime libraries built into Windows, meaning you don't have to ship an extra DLLs with your final program (and it’s also free, which is always good).

5. www.reddit.com › r › cpp[Q] Windows: non-MSVC Toolchains : r/cpp - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › r › cpp

   • Cached

   If you decide to use mingw anyway, I strongly recommend you just go get msys2 and get your mingw installation through their package manager (which also includes binaries and development files for most major open source libraries, making your life easier).

6. dev.opencascade.org › content › mingw-w64-vs-msvcMinGW-w64 vs. MSVC - Forum Open Cascade Technology

   dev.opencascade.org › content › mingw-w64-vs-msvc

   • Cached

   Apr 22, 2016 · MSVC is doing the compilation job significantly faster than MinGW-w64. The DLL sizes are comparable, if optimization is set to "-O2" for MinGW-w64, with "-O3" the DLLs from MinGW-w64 are larger. Binary files compiled with MinGW-w64 are performing significantly better than those compiled with MSVC.

7. People also ask

   Is MinGW faster than MSVCRT?

   • Yes, it is that much slower for sin (). Microsoft made the "universal run time" (aka UCRT) available to help such projects break their dependency on msvcrt.dll but as yet MinGW has not taken advantage of it. But this is enormous problem - if compiled with gcc mathematical software is two times slower than compiled with mscv!

   visual c++ - Why MINGW64 gcc produce much SLOWER code than MS…

   stackoverflow.com/questions/76238757/why-mingw64-gcc-produce-much-slower-code-than-msvc-for-this-source

   See all results for this question

   Is MSVCRT faster than sin()?

   • What you are actually comparing are the C runtime implementations of the sin () function. The MinGW project made a historical mistake of not implementing (or borrowing) their own C runtime. Relying instead on msvcrt.dll, an old dog that has not been improved over the past 25 years. Yes, it is that much slower for sin ().

   visual c++ - Why MINGW64 gcc produce much SLOWER code than MS…

   stackoverflow.com/questions/76238757/why-mingw64-gcc-produce-much-slower-code-than-msvc-for-this-source

   See all results for this question

   Is GCC/MinGW a good compiler?

   • Despite all that, GCC/MinGW is an entirely reliable quality compiler, which in my opinion outperforms any to date available version of MSVC in terms of quality of generated code. This is somewhat less pronounced with the most recent versions of MSVC, but still visible.

   GCC worth using on Windows to replace MSVC? - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/8029092/gcc-worth-using-on-windows-to-replace-msvc

   See all results for this question

   Does MinGW-w64 support ucrt?

   • Microsoft made the "universal run time" (aka UCRT) available to help such projects break their dependency on msvcrt.dll but as yet MinGW has not taken advantage of it. But this is enormous problem - if compiled with gcc mathematical software is two times slower than compiled with mscv! @HansPassant, MinGW-w64 does support UCRT.

   visual c++ - Why MINGW64 gcc produce much SLOWER code than MS…

   stackoverflow.com/questions/76238757/why-mingw64-gcc-produce-much-slower-code-than-msvc-for-this-source

   See all results for this question

   Is GCC better than MSVC?

   • They're not made to be substitutable plugins (although Clang is working on becoming that way). GCC is a fine compiler, and can produce code that has pretty much the same performance, if not better, than MSVC. It is missing some low-level Windows-specific features though. Apart from this, to answer your questions:

   GCC worth using on Windows to replace MSVC? - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/8029092/gcc-worth-using-on-windows-to-replace-msvc

   See all results for this question

   What is MSVCRT vs ucrt?

   • MSVCRT vs UCRT These are two variants of the C standard library on Microsoft Windows. MSVCRT (Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime) is available by default on all Microsoft Windows versions, but due to backwards compatibility issues is stuck in the past, not C99 compatible and is missing some features.

   Differences between msvcrt, ucrt and vcruntime libraries

   stackoverflow.com/questions/67848972/differences-between-msvcrt-ucrt-and-vcruntime-libraries

   See all results for this question

8. sourceforge.net › p › mingw-w64MinGW-w64 - for 32 and 64 bit Windows / Discussion / Open ...

   sourceforge.net › p › mingw-w64

   • Cached

   Mar 12, 2015 · A quick test revealed that the implementation shipped by MinGW-w64 needs roughly twice as much time as those from Cygwin or MSVCRT. Furthermore, a custom MinGW-w64 build which uses the implementation of MSVCRT rather than its own yields about the same performance for svm-train as the prebuilt binary (unmodified: 32s vs. 20s runtime for a ...