Search results
Jun 16, 2021 · Instead of exploring the way the book touched biologists such as James Watson and Francis Crick, as well as its critical reception by others such as Linus Pauling and Max Perutz, I argue that Schrödinger’s classic is a timeless manifesto, rather than a dated historical curiosity.
- Rob Phillips
- 2021
Jun 16, 2021 · Instead of exploring the way the book touched biologists such as James Watson and Francis Crick, as well as its critical reception by others such as Linus Pauling and Max Perutz, I argue that Schrödinger's classic is a timeless manifesto, rather than a dated historical curiosity.
- Rob Phillips
- 2021
Feb 7, 2021 · Instead of exploring the way the book touched biologists such as James Watson and Francis Crick, as well as its critical reception by others such as Linus Pauling and Max Perutz, I argue that Schrödinger's classic is a timeless manifesto, rather than a dated historical curiosity.
- Rob Phillips
- 2021
Feb 7, 2021 · classic is a timeless manifesto, rather than a dated historical curiosity. “What is Life?” is full of timely outlooks and approaches to understanding the mysterious living world that...
Sep 3, 2018 · In the winter of 1943, the physicist Erwin Schrödinger invited the Dublin public to hear him deliver a series of lectures he described as “difficult” and that “could not be termed popular”.
Nov 16, 2019 · In his book What is Life? – The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell , Erwin Schrödinger gives a “naïve physicist’s” answer to the question "how can the events in space and time which take place within the spatial boundary of a living organism be accounted for by physics and chemistry?"
People also ask
Is Schrödinger a timeless manifesto?
Is Schrödinger's 'what is life' a manifesto for biologists?
When did Erwin Schrödinger write 'what is life'?
How did Schrödinger present the problem of life?
What is Schrödinger's 'little book'?
What does Schrödinger say about life?
Instead of exploring the way the book touched biologists such as James Watson and Francis Crick, as well as its critical reception by others such as Linus Pauling and Max Perutz, I argue that Schrödinger's classic is a timeless manifesto, rather than a dated historical curiosity.