Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.berghahnjournals.com › view › journalsThe Rise of Despotic Majoritarianism - Berghahn Journals

   www.berghahnjournals.com › view › journals

   • Cached

   Jun 1, 2022 · Despotic majoritarianism refers to a form of democracy in which powerholders draw on majoritarian victories (such as in elections or referenda) to claim political legitimacy, while engaging in administrative despotism that constrains political expression and participation.

   • Author: Benjamin Abrams

2. discovery.ucl.ac.uk › id › eprintThe Rise of Despotic Majoritarianism - UCL Discovery

   discovery.ucl.ac.uk › id › eprint

   • Cached

   The “tyranny of the majority” and “administrative despotism”—first identified by Alexis de Tocqueville almost two centuries ago—have combined in the form of a new, much more threatening democratic mutation.

   • DOI: 10.3167/dt.2022.090105
   • Type: Article

   • Title: The Rise of Despotic Majoritarianism

3. Videos

   • 

     52:14

     youtube.com

     23. Democracy and Majority Rule (II)

     Apr 6, 2011

     48.1K Views

   • 

     50:40

     youtube.com

     22. Democracy and Majority Rule (I)

     Apr 6, 2011

     60.3K Views

   • 

     42:05

     youtube.com

     21. Democratic Statecraft: Tocqueville's Democracy in America

     Sep 22, 2008

     109.4K Views

   View all

4. www.cambridge.org › core › journalsPreferences for consensus and majoritarian democracy: long ...

   www.cambridge.org › core › journals

   • Cached

   Abstract. This article analyzes individuals’ preferences for a consensus or a majoritarian type of democracy. We theorize that variation in these preferences is a function of both institutional learning (long term) and individuals’ position as a political minority or majority (short term).

   • Author: Mónica Ferrín, Enrique Hernández

   • Publish Year: 2021

   • 
   • 
   • 
   • 

5. freedomhouse.org › sites › defaultBreaking Down Democracy: Goals, Strategies, and Methods of ...

   freedomhouse.org › sites › default

   crude majoritarianism is spreading from modern authoritarian regimes to illiberal leaders in what are still partly democratic countries. Increasing-ly, populist politicians—once in office—claim the right to suppress the media, civil society, and other democratic institutions by citing support from a majority of voters. The resulting

   • File Size: 2MB

   • Page Count: 64

6. link.springer.com › chapter › 10Compromise and Majority Rule: How Their Dynamic Affects Democracy

   link.springer.com › chapter › 10

   • Cached

   May 27, 2020 · In an ever-growing democratic frenzy of majoritarianism, they are regarded as signs of administrative or even political despotism which can be legitimately overthrown—if, at least, democratic citizens have the revolutionary spirit to do that.

   • Author: Patrick Overeem
   • Email: p.overeem@vu.nl

   • Publish Year: 2020

7. www.tandfonline.com › doi › fullAn ambiguous tool of demos accountability: taking the ...

   www.tandfonline.com › doi › full

   Nov 27, 2021 · They do not literally refer to the presence of a despotic regime but point to abuses of majority power that amount to less than full-fledged tyranny. With polemical exaggeration, they denounce oppressive structures and practices within democratic regimes.

8. People also ask

   Is despotic majoritarianism a form of democracy?

   • The reason I call despotic majoritarianism a “form of democracy” rather than a political ideology, or style, is that—although certain regimes may express more or less majoritarian or more or less despotic behaviors—both steadily increase over time, in tandem, to effect the shift in the character of democracy to which we are now bearing witness.

   The Rise of Despotic Majoritarianism in: Democratic Theory Volume 9

   www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/democratic-theory/9/1/dt090105.xml

   See all results for this question

   Are majoritarianism signs of political despotism?

   • In an ever-growing democratic frenzy of majoritarianism, they are regarded as signs of administrative or even political despotism which can be legitimately overthrown—if, at least, democratic citizens have the revolutionary spirit to do that. Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005).

   Compromise and Majority Rule: How Their Dynamic Affects Democracy

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-40802-2_3

   See all results for this question

   Is a more majoritarian type of democracy feasible or advantageous?

   • more majoritarian type of democracy “is probably neither feasible nor advantageous.” for extreme-right and populist parties. Andeweg ( 2001) observes an empirical correlation of consensus democracy and electoral support for the extreme right. He argues that the the extremes, as only these parties provide a real alternative to the “establishment.”

   Comparative Political Regimes: Consensus and Majoritarian Democracy

   www.researchgate.net/publication/321756741_Comparative_Political_Regimes_Consensus_and_Majoritarian_Democracy

   See all results for this question

   Are majoritarian systems better for Democracy?

   • Those who are part of the political minority, as measured by the fact that they support smaller parties, are more supportive of consensus democracy, while those who vote for large parties tend to think that majoritarian systems are best for democracy.

   Preferences for consensus and majoritarian democracy: long- and short

   www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-political-science-review/article/preferences-for-consensus-and-majoritarian-democracy-long-and-shortterm-influences/865BE64CC6B0369D96145514186B84FA

   See all results for this question

   Is modern democracy a compromise between administrative despotism and popular sovereignty?

   • However that may be, near the end of the second volume, in the famous chapter on ‘What sort of despotism democratic nations have to fear’, he meaningfully speaks of modern democracy as a “sort of compromise between administrative despotism and popular sovereignty” (2000: 662; emphasis added).

   Compromise and Majority Rule: How Their Dynamic Affects Democracy

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-40802-2_3

   See all results for this question

   Do political positions affect citizens' preferences about consensual and majoritarian democracy?

   • Hence, individuals’ political positions as an electoral majority or minority will have a stronger impact on citizens’ preferences about consensual and majoritarian democracy in young democracies than in contexts with a prolonged democratic experience. In other words, we hypothesize that

   Preferences for consensus and majoritarian democracy: long- and short

   www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-political-science-review/article/preferences-for-consensus-and-majoritarian-democracy-long-and-shortterm-influences/865BE64CC6B0369D96145514186B84FA

   See all results for this question

9. www.researchgate.net › publication › 321756741(PDF) Comparative Political Regimes: Consensus and ...

   www.researchgate.net › publication › 321756741

   Dec 12, 2017 · The study of democracy today has been influenced heavily by Arend Lijphart’s typology of consensus versus majoritarian democracy. Scholars have applied it to more than 100 countries and sought...