Search results
Jan 1, 2003 · Whatever the outcome, emotion has been too long neglected or understated in theories of motivation. Our speculations and those of our colleagues await innovative research and theory development that link conceptually complex processes to authentic learning experiences.
- Motivation, Emotion, Cognition, and Communication ...
Motivation and emotion are complex and multifaceted...
- Motivation, Emotion, Cognition, and Communication ...
The Motivational Theory will be shown to explain how emotions motivate better than Cognitivism and Perceptualism, and to offer solutions to two outstanding problems in the philosophy of emotions: explaining the intentionality of emotions and explaining how emotions differ from one another.
This review discusses the history of motivation and emotion concepts in psychology and affective neuroscience, drawing on both animal studies and human studies, in order to gain a better perspective on recent concepts and debates.
One common taxonomy of emotion theories includes a category called “basic emotion theories,” a category called “appraisal theories,” and a category called “construction theories” (sometimes distinguishing psychological and social variants) (e.g., Gross & Barrett, 2011).
Emotion utilization, typically dependent on effective emotion-cognition interactions, is adaptive thought or action that stems, in part, directly from the experience of emotion feeling/motivation and in part from learned cognitive, social, and behavioral skills.
MTE explains what I have called the phenomena of emotional motivation—impulsivity, flexibility, and bodily underpinnings—better than the two currently most popular philosophical theories of emotions, namely Cognitivism and Perceptualism.
People also ask
Is emotion understated in motivation theories?
What is the motivational theory of emotions?
Is emotion a part of motivational experience?
What is emotional motivation?
How does emotion affect motivation?
Jan 1, 2019 · Motivation and emotion are complex and multifaceted constructs that are approachable on multiple levels of analysis from genetics to social anthropology; but it is not correct to conclude that either construct is unmeasurable, scientifically invalid, or impervious to integrative theory.
