Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. stackoverflow.com › questions › 590007Python or IronPython - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com › questions › 590007

   Feb 28, 2009 · One of the pros of IronPython is that, unlike CPython, IronPython doesn't use the Global Interpreter Lock, thus making threading more effective. In the standard Python implementation, threads grab the GIL on each object access.

2. stackoverflow.com › questions › 504716Why is IronPython faster than the Official Python Interpreter

   stackoverflow.com › questions › 504716

   Mar 15, 2010 · IronPython (Python for .Net) is faster than regular Python (cPython) on the same machine. Why is this? I would think compiled C code would always be faster than the equivalent CLI bytecode.

3. linuxhint.com › cpython-jython-ironpython-pypy-cythonDifference between CPython, Jython, IronPython, PyPy, and Cython

   linuxhint.com › cpython-jython-ironpython-pypy-cython

   • Cached

   Similar to how Jython has been developed for Java users, IronPython is the popular Python implementation that has been written in C-Sharp (C#) and has been designed to run on the .NET platform.

4. www.infoworld.com › article › 226676510 Pythons for every programming need - InfoWorld

   www.infoworld.com › article › 2266765

   • Cached

   Oct 4, 2023 · Here’s a brief tour of Python distributions, from the standard implementation (CPython) to versions optimized for speed (PyPy), special use cases (Anaconda, ActivePython), different language...

5. content.helpme-codesys.com › en › CODESYS ScriptingComparison of IronPython and cPython

   content.helpme-codesys.com › en › CODESYS Scripting

   There are some small differences and Incompatibilities between IronPython and "standard" Python ("cPython"). Some are direct errors in IronPython and should be removed in future versions. However, others are considered "implementation details" and will remain.

6. github.com › IronLanguages › ironpython3ironpython3/Documentation/differences-from-c-python.md at ...

   github.com › IronLanguages › ironpython3

   • Cached

   This page documents various differences between IronPython and CPython. Since IronPython is under active development, any of the differences described here may change or disappear in the future: Environment Variables; COM Interaction; Strings; Interaction with the Operating System; Codecs; Source File Encoding; Recursion

7. People also ask

   What is the difference between IronPython & PyPy?

   • Jython compiles your Python code to Java bytecode, so your Python code can run on the JVM. IronPython lets you run Python on the Microsoft CLR. And PyPy, being implemented in (a subset of) Python, lets you run Python code faster than CPython, which rightly should blow your mind.

   Python vs Cpython - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/17130975/python-vs-cpython

   See all results for this question

   Is CPython better than iron Python?

   • Cpython executes a basic hello world nearly instantly (<100ms), where IronPython has an startup overhead of 4 or 5 seconds. This annoys me, but not enough to keep me from using IronPython. That's not an advantage of CPython over IronPython for themselves. The 4 or 5 sconds are the startup time of the CLR, not of IronPython.

   performance - Why is IronPython faster than the Official Python

   stackoverflow.com/questions/504716/why-is-ironpython-faster-than-the-official-python-interpreter

   See all results for this question

   Why is IronPython faster than CIL?

   • Python code doesn't get compiled to C, Python itself is written in C and interprets Python bytecode. CIL gets compiled to machine code, which is why you see better performance when using IronPython. There is one catch, though. I agree on why IronPython is faster. IronPython is slower in terms of startup time.

   performance - Why is IronPython faster than the Official Python

   stackoverflow.com/questions/504716/why-is-ironpython-faster-than-the-official-python-interpreter

   See all results for this question

   What are the pros and cons of IronPython?

   • One of the pros of IronPython is that, unlike CPython, IronPython doesn't use the Global Interpreter Lock, thus making threading more effective. In the standard Python implementation, threads grab the GIL on each object access. This limits parallel execution, which matters especially if you expect to fully utilize multiple CPUs.

   Python or IronPython - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/590007/python-or-ironpython

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between IronPython and C#?

   • There are a number of important differences: Interoperability with other .NET languages. You can use other .NET libraries from an IronPython application, or use IronPython from a C# application, for example. This interoperability is increasing, with a movement toward greater support for dynamic types in .NET 4.0.

   Python or IronPython - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/590007/python-or-ironpython

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between IronPython and fepy?

   • Here's a list of differences. And there's fepy.sourceforge.net which may offer additional libraries by avoiding Microsoft licensing snafus. Python is Python, the only difference is that IronPython was designed to run on the CLR (.NET Framework), and as such, can inter-operate and consume .NET assemblies written in other .NET languages.

   Python or IronPython - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/590007/python-or-ironpython

   See all results for this question

8. brokenco.de › 2007/12/18 › comparing-ironpython-andComparing IronPython and CPython - brokenco.de

   brokenco.de › 2007/12/18 › comparing-ironpython-and

   • Cached

   Dec 18, 2007 · In general though this isn't the be-all end-all benchmark for IronPython, especially on Mono, but it does give a nice hint of where some improvements could be made both in the Mono runtime and IronPython.