Search results
- Participants (n = 207) reported on their use of nine social influence tactics, including both complaisant (e.g., building relationships, using reason) and coercive (e.g., punishing or directly coercing others) tactics. Prestige was positively associated with complaisant tactics but negatively associated with coercive tactics.
Jul 1, 2021 · Prestige was positively associated with complaisant tactics but negatively associated with coercive tactics. Dominance was positively associated with both coercive tactics and complaisant tactics. This study provides evidence linking the overarching strategies people use to regulate their social rank to specific forms of social influence.
- Alexandra B. Ketterman, Jon K. Maner
- 2021
Research in evolutionary psychology has identified two general strategies—dominance and prestige—used to attain influence and high social rank within groups. Whereas dominance is defined by the use of force to gain social rank, prestige is defined by the display of valued skills and abilities.
Jan 10, 2022 · As human relationships come with extensive benefits, strategic behaviours or social tactics in such relationships can also correlate with dominance and prestige. Dominance is associated with both coercive and complaisant (gaining influence by pleasing others) social tactics, in line with its dependence on perceived cost-infliction abilities ...
Jul 1, 2021 · Prestige was positively associated with complaisant tactics but negatively associated with coercive tactics. Dominance was positively associated with both coercive tactics and complaisant...
pursuit of social status is a recurrent and pervasive challenge faced by pe. 1 human societies. Yet, the precise means through which individuals compete for stat. 32 unclear. In two studies, we investigated the impact of two fundamental strategies—Dominance.
Nov 19, 2012 · In contrast, the Dominance–Prestige Account holds that Dominance and Prestige represent independent and distinct avenues to social rank, and thus Dominance and Prestige should each be independently associated with high social rank, even after controlling for shared variance.
People also ask
Is prestige associated with coercive and complaisant social tactics?
Do prestige and dominance coexist?
Are dominance and prestige a viable avenue to social rank and influence?
What are dominance and prestige?
Is prestige more socially malleable than dominance?
Are dominance and prestige a viable strategy for achieving influence?
Dominance and prestige represent evolved strategies used to navigate social hierarchies. Dominance is a strategy through which people gain and maintain social rank by using coercion, intimidation, and power.
