Search results
- Self-efficacy beliefs do not reflect a generic sense of competence, but are instead context-specific. Therefore, self-efficacy should be assessed by using an ad hoc scale measuring individual behaviors that allows social workers to exercise influence over events that affect their work life.
People also ask
What is the hospital social work Self-Efficacy scale?
Is there a self-efficacy scale for social workers?
Can self-efficacy measures be used in social work educational outcome assessments?
How do social workers measure self-efficacy?
What is self-efficacy in Social Work Education?
Does sessw measure self-efficacy beliefs in social work?
Aug 31, 2017 · The Evaluation Self-Efficacy (ESE) scale was designed as an outcome measure for evaluation research courses in social work. A revised version of the Social Cognitive Theory–based ESE (ESE-II) was developed and evaluated in the current study including both new and revised items.
- Self-Efficacy as a Target for Social Work Intervention
Social workers frequently enhance their clients’...
- Self-Efficacy as a Target for Social Work Intervention
Sep 3, 2013 · The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy scale was proposed by Holden and colleagues in order to measure social workers’ confidence in their ability to perform specific social work tasks. Yet, the scale measures self-efficacy in a specific practice setting—social work in hospitals—thus making it difficult to generalize the results to other ...
- Monica Pedrazza, Elena Trifiletti, Sabrina Berlanda, Gian Antonio Di Bernardo
- 2013
Sep 3, 2013 · The self-efficacy scale for social workers (SESSW), developed by Pedrazza et al. (2013) and translated into Chinese by To et al. (2021), measures practitioners' sense of self-efficacy in...
Social workers frequently enhance their clients’ self-efficacy by attending to and promoting clients’ perceptions of their own capabilities. Social workers can consciously select from among several channels to increase clients’ self-efficacy.
- Anne-Linda Furstenberg, Kathleen A. Rounds
- 1995
- Descriptive Statistics
- Factor Structure
- Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity to Change
Descriptive statistics were obtained using all available data (Ns ranged from 118 to 158; see footnote Table 8.1). Both individual ESE-III items and total scale scores were considered (Cronbach, 1963). These statistics are detailed in Table 8.1. At pretest, students’ average ESE-III item ratings were lowest (30.26) for item #16 [Create and carry ou...
Preliminary analyses supported the suitability of the data at both assessment points, as demonstrated by a KMO-value of .93 and .94 at pre- and posttest respectively (>.60) and a significant (p< .001) Bartlett’s test of Sphericity. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with principal axis factoring revealed a single-factor solution at both assessment p...
Reliability. In terms of the internal consistency of the ESE-III, examination of the complete set of cases (n = 113) revealed Cronbach alphas at both pretest (α = .96) and posttest (α = .97) well above the minimally adequate cut-off of α= .70. Convergent construct validity. As hypothesized, at pretest a positive observed correlation was found that ...
the Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy (HSWSE) scale, which assesses social workers' confi. dence in their ability to perform 39 specific hospital social work tasks. Evidence that the Method. HSWSE produces reliable and valid data Measures has been obtained (Cuzzi, Holden, Rutter, Development oftheSWSE.
Jan 1, 2013 · Development of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Social Workers (SESSW) We developed a scale specific for social workers (SESSW), following Bandura’s [5,42] guidelines for the development...
