Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.jmptonline.org › article › S0161-4754(08)00237-6Differences in Range of Motion Between Dominant and ...

   www.jmptonline.org › article › S0161-4754(08)00237-6

   The results of this study showed a statistically significant difference between dominant and nondominant sides for 34 of the 60 ROM measured. The maximum mean difference between sides for all ROM measured was 7.5°.

2. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › 32105229Comparison of bite force on the dominant and nondominant ...

   pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › 32105229

   Furthermore, the differences between the male and female dominant sides and between the male and female nondominant sides were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in bite force between the age groups (P > 0.05).

   • Author: Sulthan Ibrahim Raja Khan, Dinesh Rao, Anupama Ramachandran, Baskaran Veni Ashok

   • Publish Year: 2020

3. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articlesA Comparative Study of the Modified Baumann’s Angle Between ...

   www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articles

   Oct 25, 2023 · A significant difference was found in the modified Baumann’s angle between dominant and non-dominant sides, and it also showed a negative significant correlation with arm length, forearm length, and the presence of secondary sexual characteristics.

   • DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47687
   • Published: 2023/10

   • Publication: Cureus. 2023 Oct; 15(10): e47687.

4. www.sciencedirect.com › science › articleDifferences in Range of Motion Between Dominant and ...

   www.sciencedirect.com › science › article

   Oct 1, 2008 · The results of this study showed a statistically significant difference between dominant and nondominant sides for 34 of the 60 ROM measured. The maximum mean difference between sides for all ROM measured was 7.5°.

   • Author: Luciana Gazzi Macedo, David J. Magee

   • Publish Year: 2008

5. www.researchgate.net › figure › Confidence-intervalConfidence interval of the difference between dominant and ...

   www.researchgate.net › figure › Confidence-interval

   Macedo and Magee (2008) found a significant difference between dominant and non-dominant sides in 34 of the 60 ROM measured with a standard goniometer. However, these differences were minimal,...

6. link.springer.com › article › 10Dominant vs. non-dominant hip comparison in bone mineral ...

   link.springer.com › article › 10

   • Cached

   May 25, 2019 · The BMD difference between the dominant and non-dominant sides was significant in the LIG, with BMD being higher in the dominant side. Conversly, BMD was higher in the non-dominant hip within the HIG. However, the hip asymmetries were not clinically relevant (%BMD difference < 3%).

7. People also ask

   Is there a statistically significant difference between dominant and nondominant sides?

   • A paired t test was used for the comparison between sides. The results of this study showed a statistically significant difference between dominant and nondominant sides for 34 of the 60 ROM measured. The maximum mean difference between sides for all ROM measured was 7.5°.

   Differences in Range of Motion Between Dominant and

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475408002376

   See all results for this question

   Does ROM have a significant difference between dominant and nondominant sides?

   • The order of the joints, motion, sides, and active or passive motion testing was randomly selected. A paired t test was used for the comparison between sides. The results of this study showed a statistically significant difference between dominant and nondominant sides for 34 of the 60 ROM measured.

   Differences in Range of Motion Between Dominant and Nondominant S…

   www.jmptonline.org/article/S0161-4754(08)00237-6/fulltext

   See all results for this question

   How many motions are different between dominant and nondominant sides?

   • Thirty-four of the 60 motions measured were significantly different between dominant and nondominant sides, and these differences were small, ranging from 0.26° to 7.54°. Only 5 of the 60 motions had a difference between sides greater than 5°, and none of the motions had a difference greater than 8°.

   Differences in Range of Motion Between Dominant and

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475408002376

   See all results for this question

   Is there a difference between a dominant and non-dominant hip?

   • BMD was higher in the non-dominant hip in high-impact sports, whereas the dominant hip had increased BMD for low-impact sports. The side-to-side differences were relatively small and not clinically relevant. It is unknown whether there is difference in BMD at the hip between dominant and non-dominant sides in young athletes.

   Dominant vs. non-dominant hip comparison in bone mineral density in

   link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-019-0605-2

   See all results for this question

   Do nondominant and dominant sides of the elbow have different ROM?

   • Gunal et al reported that ROM of the elbow and were statistically greater on the nondominant side; however the differences were small, ranging from 1.7° to 2.8°. Murray et al, Barnes et al, Ellenbecker, and Gunal et al compared shoulder motion between dominant and nondominant sides with no clear pattern emerging.

   Differences in Range of Motion Between Dominant and Nondominant S…

   www.jmptonline.org/article/S0161-4754(08)00237-6/fulltext

   See all results for this question

   What is the average modified Baumann's angle on the dominant and nondominant sides?

   • The average modified Baumann's angle on the dominant and non-dominant sides was determined to be 17.07±4.41° and 17.05±4.06°, respectively, in females.

   A Comparative Study of the Modified Baumann’s Angle Between the

   www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684030/

   See all results for this question

8. bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.comShoulder range of movement in the general population: age and ...

   bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com

   • Cached

   Oct 12, 2020 · There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the range of active left and right shoulder flexion and left shoulder external rotation for those who were right hand dominant compared to those who were left hand dominant (Table 4).